Mustang Pickups originally Alnico or Ceramic?

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
SuperG
.
.
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:45 am

Mustang Pickups originally Alnico or Ceramic?

Post by SuperG »

I've been searching for this answer far and wide with no luck.
Were vintage Mustang pickups originally alnico or ceramic? How about US and Japanese reissues?
User avatar
Haze
.
.
Posts: 4924
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:27 am
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by Haze »

AlNiCo magnets across the board
User avatar
SuperG
.
.
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:45 am

Post by SuperG »

Even with the Japanese reissues? That's cool! When I did a side-by-side of the 64 and the 2002 JP RI I was surprised that they sounded very close. The more I play the RI I hear a bit of roughness around the high-end. Maybe it's those mini pots I need to replace 1st.
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

SuperG wrote:Even with the Japanese reissues? That's cool! When I did a side-by-side of the 64 and the 2002 JP RI I was surprised that they sounded very close. The more I play the RI I hear a bit of roughness around the high-end. Maybe it's those mini pots I need to replace 1st.
Yeah, differences are to be expected between any two guitars; not all parts are equal, and each little variation will affect sound (often not too noticeably)... especially when you compare 46 year old material to new stuff. Magnets lose strength over time for one, along with a host of other aging factors.
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press