What shortscale has the thinnest neck?
Moderated By: mods
- lank81
- .
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:17 pm
- Location: Uniontown, PA (Near Pittsburgh)
- Contact:
What shortscale has the thinnest neck?
I always love a thin neck (width of finger board) on the guitar. The Duo I just got has a decently thin neck and my strat has and even thinner neck. What shorties out there have a thin neck? The Jag HH Special (black w/ dragster buckers) just had too thick of a neck for me when I had it. I'd love to grab up on a couple more shorties in the year ahead especially if I can find a couple that have thinner necks.
Peace & Chicken Grease
This. I have tiny hands and finding about A width necks is what led me to shortscales in general. Got a '65 A-width Stang neck and its great to play for me.Mike wrote:Anything early 60s with an A width is going to be a slim as a Pepperami.
iCEByTes wrote:5 Most Jizz face maker Solo�s , classic Rock music i ever listened.
iCEByTes wrote:Blunt a joint , Take the Touch , Listen this.
- Phil O'Keefe
- .
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:50 am
- Location: Riverside CA USA
Yeah, an A width neck is going to be the "thinnest", if you mean the width of the neck / fingerboard.
A = 1.5"
B = 1 5/8"
C = 1.75"
D = 1 7/8"
Almost all of the Fender shortscale necks you come across are going to be A or B in width. I don't recall ever seeing a C, and D width necks are exceptionally rare, even on other models. But Fender used to offer those widths as options, so anything's possible I suppose. But their standard width is a B width. I've always thought of this width dimension in terms of "wide" or "narrow", not thinness.
The other dimensions have at least as much influence on how a neck is going to "feel" to me as the width does. I've always liked what I call "thinner" necks - with thinness being determined by the thickness of the neck measured from the center of the top of the fingerboard to the center of the back of the neck. Probably the "thinnest" stock Fender necks I have ever owned were on my early 80s 25.5" scale Fender Bullets. I have four different 24" Fender necks here, and all of them are different in that regard; with the thinnest being the '94 MIJ Mustang neck that I have on my '75 Duo Sonic project guitar, and the original '75 Music Master neck.
The other important dimension in terms of neck "feel", at least for me, is the neck's "profile"; or how the back of the neck is shaped. Fender uses letters to describe the actual profile shape of the neck. V necks are sometimes called "boat necks", and are commonly seen on mid - late 50s era Strats. C necks are the classic "60s" shape, with more rounded "shoulders" or sides of the neck nearer to where it hits the fingerboard. With a D or U profile neck (common on 50s era Telecasters), those sides are a bit fleshier and the neck - even if it's the same B width and thickness, will feel "chunkier" in your hand. I have a gorgeous 1965 vintage Mustang neck that is in nearly mint condition that I was going to use on that project guitar, but it only lasted 5 minutes on there due to the D profile and me not getting along with it.
So to me, the neck's width is only one of the factors I consider... it also has to be fairly thin (front to back) and have a suitable profile too.
A = 1.5"
B = 1 5/8"
C = 1.75"
D = 1 7/8"
Almost all of the Fender shortscale necks you come across are going to be A or B in width. I don't recall ever seeing a C, and D width necks are exceptionally rare, even on other models. But Fender used to offer those widths as options, so anything's possible I suppose. But their standard width is a B width. I've always thought of this width dimension in terms of "wide" or "narrow", not thinness.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30128/301287950893e09d8fcaa99baca8cdc6f6412b34" alt="Smile :)"
The other dimensions have at least as much influence on how a neck is going to "feel" to me as the width does. I've always liked what I call "thinner" necks - with thinness being determined by the thickness of the neck measured from the center of the top of the fingerboard to the center of the back of the neck. Probably the "thinnest" stock Fender necks I have ever owned were on my early 80s 25.5" scale Fender Bullets. I have four different 24" Fender necks here, and all of them are different in that regard; with the thinnest being the '94 MIJ Mustang neck that I have on my '75 Duo Sonic project guitar, and the original '75 Music Master neck.
The other important dimension in terms of neck "feel", at least for me, is the neck's "profile"; or how the back of the neck is shaped. Fender uses letters to describe the actual profile shape of the neck. V necks are sometimes called "boat necks", and are commonly seen on mid - late 50s era Strats. C necks are the classic "60s" shape, with more rounded "shoulders" or sides of the neck nearer to where it hits the fingerboard. With a D or U profile neck (common on 50s era Telecasters), those sides are a bit fleshier and the neck - even if it's the same B width and thickness, will feel "chunkier" in your hand. I have a gorgeous 1965 vintage Mustang neck that is in nearly mint condition that I was going to use on that project guitar, but it only lasted 5 minutes on there due to the D profile and me not getting along with it.
So to me, the neck's width is only one of the factors I consider... it also has to be fairly thin (front to back) and have a suitable profile too.
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
Re: What shortscale has the thinnest neck?
the compstang neck are pretty thin or the jag-stang neck.
This 59 Musicamaster A width is pretty slight. But it's also a fret shorter than a 24. It would take some getting used to.
I use THIS reference site more than ANY other (after SS of course).
I use THIS reference site more than ANY other (after SS of course).
Yell Like Hell