data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53845/53845c53f0c80bde05ee1481643f23e89f06a1d3" alt="Image"
Does anyone own one of these and are they any good?
Moderated By: mods
Very true . Aria prolly has better pickups and electrics . I know my bridge pickups sucks and will be replaced soon . But the feel and playability of the Eastwood is really good for what it is . I'm sure the Aria is the other end of the coin .Fran wrote: I think its arguable that the Eastwoods are better. They get slammed by some owners. Still, until we can bite the bullet and buy a Hallmark i suppose its all matter of opinion.
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
The original Aria Pro IIs were Matsumoku (the plant also made Ibanez, Vantage, Westbury, Westone, Cimar, CSL, Antoria, Ventura, amongst other lesser known brands), but the Diamond model was nothing like a Mosrite im fairly positive. In fact someone had an original one in ss classifieds about a year ago and it looked more like the 'Wildcat'.. Strat type thing.ekwatts wrote:Aria's tend to be pretty good anyway, even right down at this level.
Aren't they the original Matsumoko guys? That's got to count for something.
Fran wrote:The original Aria Pro IIs were Matsumoku (the plant also made Ibanez, Vantage, Westbury, Westone, Cimar, CSL, Antoria, Ventura, amongst other lesser known brands), but the Diamond model was nothing like a Mosrite im fairly positive. In fact someone had an original one in ss classifieds about a year ago and it looked more like the 'Wildcat'.. Strat type thing.ekwatts wrote:Aria's tend to be pretty good anyway, even right down at this level.
Aren't they the original Matsumoko guys? That's got to count for something.
fat southern dude from Ends post wrote:so take that all you brand snobs.. you go buy all them high dollar f^<kn' gear, you still cant get tone like that. you know why? cause your a dumb @ss
I just like guitars that people tend to remember. My Batwing stands out a mile from your average strat style guitar, in spite of being, for all intents and purposes, a strat copy (though the original Burns Marquee-style design is only a shade younger than the Stratocaster anyway, but I'm looking at it in terms of people who are unaware of the history of Burns guitars). Plus, my two Burnses'ses were bargains in terms of the build-quality/sounds to price ratio. I've no real compulsion to replace the pickups, change the bridge, upgrade the tuners, etc. Anyway, I just don't see them as being ugly. They have genuine personality that I just don't pick up on with a regular strat or tele anymore, and particularly not with guitars that have had the soul drained out of them on purpose like your average Ibanez Nu Metal time machine.benecol wrote:Truly Watts, you peddle the ugliest guitars in the world. Have you ever had your sense of aesthetics calibrated?
Brandon W wrote:you elites.