Tube amps with shizzloads of clean headroom...
Moderated By: mods
- chrismakesgod
- .
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:11 pm
- Location: Central Scotland
Tube amps with shizzloads of clean headroom...
I would appreciate a list of tube amps in the £300-500 with loads of clean head room. I would prefer a head so i can plug it into this sweet little 2 x 10 i got for £30.
Im deliberately being un specific. I want what your favourites are so i can excercise my fingers and do some online research.
Im deliberately being un specific. I want what your favourites are so i can excercise my fingers and do some online research.
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
I have a 1970s Laney 'Supergroup' head, its actually a PA head, 60w valve and impossible to distort but will deafen you past 4 on the volume anyway. I paid £50 for it and love it because it is the perfect 'blank canvas', a few pedals is all i need.
So yeah, if you can find an old PA head from the 70's/80's (they turn up on ebay) like Sound City, Laney, Carlsbro, Peavey, etc. you will get more clean headroom than you could ever need.
So yeah, if you can find an old PA head from the 70's/80's (they turn up on ebay) like Sound City, Laney, Carlsbro, Peavey, etc. you will get more clean headroom than you could ever need.
- Rayjaysonic
- .
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:57 pm
- Location: Brizzle England Cheers Drive!
- Contact:
Bugera V55HD. Think you can pick them up for about £260 new. Swap the tubes out for JJ's with the spare cash. Runs at 4, 8 and 16 ohms so can use it with just about any cab you want. It's a lovely amp for cleans. Takes pedals well too. The dirt channel isn't too great but is much improved by the tube swap.
Don't look at me I'm irrelevant!
I was going to say, I didn't think bassman's were known for being good clean amps. You can always find late 70's Twin Reverbs for pretty cheap. I got mine for only $400, I know that converted to pounds that's above your price range, and it's a combo, not a head. But keep your eye open for those, you can always bypass the speakers in the twin in favor of your cab if you prefer.
As a straight conversation it is well with in his price range, but I think he would be pretty lucky to find one for that kind of money (i.e £255) here.Billy3000 wrote:I was going to say, I didn't think bassman's were known for being good clean amps. You can always find late 70's Twin Reverbs for pretty cheap. I got mine for only $400, I know that converted to pounds that's above your price range, and it's a combo, not a head. But keep your eye open for those, you can always bypass the speakers in the twin in favor of your cab if you prefer.
obscure pop culture reference
Yea, I didn't know how common they would be over there in that price range. I seem to be seeing a ton of 70's twin reverbs popping up in that price range around here... even quite a few silverfaces.Stuart wrote:As a straight conversation it is well with in his price range, but I think he would be pretty lucky to find one for that kind of money (i.e £255) here.Billy3000 wrote:I was going to say, I didn't think bassman's were known for being good clean amps. You can always find late 70's Twin Reverbs for pretty cheap. I got mine for only $400, I know that converted to pounds that's above your price range, and it's a combo, not a head. But keep your eye open for those, you can always bypass the speakers in the twin in favor of your cab if you prefer.
I got my '72 Twin Reverb for ~$750Cdn; my guess is that's around £450?
I love the amp... though sometimes I wish it would get a little dirtydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15d97/15d97b34e2a52b768d3d1469deebea2ff13d8134" alt="Razz :P"
I love the amp... though sometimes I wish it would get a little dirty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15d97/15d97b34e2a52b768d3d1469deebea2ff13d8134" alt="Razz :P"
Donate to Ankhanu Pressekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
- 24HRS2MDNT
- .
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:47 am
- Location: Ontario Canada
+1Will wrote:Does it have to be tubes? If you can track down a Yamaha G-100 solid state amp, those sound ace. Like a less sterile (and less noisy) Jazz Chorus.
I always thought solid state were supposed to be lighter but each one I've found has been as HEAVY as Tony Iommi's nutsack.
God damn it! Its a Zombie Apocalypse. Do I have a baseball bat nearby?
- Rayjaysonic
- .
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:57 pm
- Location: Brizzle England Cheers Drive!
- Contact:
Yeah, my 1974 Marshall Lead 100 Solid State head snaps my spine every time I lift it. I think solid state combos are much lighter but heads...just as heavy as tubes I reckon!!!24HRS2MDNT wrote:
I always thought solid state were supposed to be lighter but each one I've found has been as HEAVY as Tony Iommi's nutsack.
Don't look at me I'm irrelevant!
-
- .
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
- Location: London, England
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Carlsbro-PA50-han ... 955wt_1139Fran wrote:I have a 1970s Laney 'Supergroup' head, its actually a PA head, 60w valve and impossible to distort but will deafen you past 4 on the volume anyway. I paid £50 for it and love it because it is the perfect 'blank canvas', a few pedals is all i need.
So yeah, if you can find an old PA head from the 70's/80's (they turn up on ebay) like Sound City, Laney, Carlsbro, Peavey, etc. you will get more clean headroom than you could ever need.
Just spotted this.
edit:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Carlsbro-60PA-Rev ... 500wt_1156
this one looks nicer.
Damn you guys are giving me ideas for buying a new amp!