Insight into the EHX Micro Synthesizer

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Insight into the EHX Micro Synthesizer

Post by S. Thompson »

So, right now, the tracking on the thing can be quite crummy. I've heard the bass variant has substantially better tracking and is only different by four parts, so I'm considering doing that mod. A list I found lists the parts, but I'm also interested in trying to balance out the various voices more. Right now, the square wave is quite loud and the two octave voices are quite soft. Does anyone know offhand which parts will affect the volume of the octave voices?

- Steve
Image
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

Also, from looking at the schematic, is there anyway to tell what kind of capacitor C10 is? Looking for a 100uf one via google and they all seem to be electrolytic, but I wasn't sure if there was a way to tell if the current one is ceramic or what...

- Steve
Image
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

Yeah, having this problem too. I managed to get it properly "tuned in" to my middle pickup on the Nu Sonic, but it's still a bit flappy. Have you messed with the trimpot at the back?
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

Oh yeah, I've also been using a compressor/sustainer before it to stop the dreadful cutoff that tends to happen.
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

ekwatts wrote:Oh yeah, I've also been using a compressor/sustainer before it to stop the dreadful cutoff that tends to happen.
I know that I adjusted the trimpot to change this. It's much more natural now than when I first got the pedal (no sustain for anything at all virtually).

Michael Dunn from Shotgunn mods apparently has a mod to balance out the voicing properly. He won't, however, share his knowledge for free and I'm a cheap bastard. :lol:

- Steve
Image
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

Bump.

Anyone know a good way to determine the type of capacitor for one of the components without actually opening up the box?

Maybe it's a safe assumption that it's a ceramic, but the rating seems kind of uncommon on part sites I was checking out (0.1mf).

- Steve
Image
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

S. Thompson wrote:Bump.

Anyone know a good way to determine the type of capacitor for one of the components without actually opening up the box?

Maybe it's a safe assumption that it's a ceramic, but the rating seems kind of uncommon on part sites I was checking out (0.1mf).

- Steve
No. You're better off asking at Freestompboxes or DIY stompboxes.

0.1uF is 100nf is a perfectly common value of ceramic cap.
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

If it's 0.1mf, wouldn't it be 100uf? Heh, I'm getting confused. 8)

- Steve
Image
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

S. Thompson wrote:If it's 0.1mf, wouldn't it be 100uf? Heh, I'm getting confused. 8)

- Steve
0.1μF is 0.1 microfarads, or 0.1mf if you really must.

0.1 μF = 100 nF
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

timhulio wrote:
S. Thompson wrote:If it's 0.1mf, wouldn't it be 100uf? Heh, I'm getting confused. 8)

- Steve
0.1μF is 0.1 microfarads, or 0.1mf if you really must.

0.1 μF = 100 nF
Thanks for the info! I'm still pretty new to all this stuff!

- Steve
Image
Julian
.
.
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:43 am

Post by Julian »

Here's the confusion: Some sites list capacitors as mF (m standing for micro) however the metric abbreviation for microfarads is μF

nf is nanofarads, pf is picofarads. Generally everything above 1 uf is electrolytic, and everything below is interchangeable, though people will tell you certain ones sound better. Just make sure whatever your using has a high enough voltage rating for the circuit. I think the old big box microsynths have +/- 15v supply, so getting something rated for 30-50v would be a good idea.
User avatar
avj
A Select Individual
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:54 am
Location: Detroitish.

Post by avj »

ekwatts wrote:Yeah, having this problem too. I managed to get it properly "tuned in" to my middle pickup on the Nu Sonic, but it's still a bit flappy. Have you messed with the trimpot at the back?

Oh yeah, I've also been using a compressor/sustainer before it to stop the dreadful cutoff that tends to happen.
I've found that by using a compressor (as you already are) to tame the transients and level out the attack a bit, as well as rolling back the tone knob a bit really helps with the flappy fart-farts. I also set the trimpot so that unity is about the second hash mark down from the top on the Guitar fader rather than all the way up. This seemed to help a bit, with the nice effect of also allowing a bit of boost if needed.
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

Hm, speaking of trimpots, there are two on the back of the board. The one is accessible through the hole on the back of the enclosure (old box anyway). The other trimpot isn't accessible without taking the enclosure apart.

What does the inaccessible one do? I know the one you CAN access controls volume, doesn't it?

- Steve
Image
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

Any variation between models of this pedal or a chance that maybe EHX used oddly colored/marked components to confuse cloners?

The resistor at R69 that needs to be changed out to convert the pedal to the bass micro synthesizer appears to be a way different value than expected.

- Steve
Image
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

Image

Here is a picture of the resistor in question for anyone who has messed with these before.

- Steve
Image
User avatar
avj
A Select Individual
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:54 am
Location: Detroitish.

Post by avj »

Terribly sorry I can't be of more help. I'm only familiar with the newer XO-style version; I believe the same goes for ekwatts.
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

avj wrote:Terribly sorry I can't be of more help. I'm only familiar with the newer XO-style version; I believe the same goes for ekwatts.
The "smoothing filter" caps are also all different values than expected. Very strange and very frustrating... :twisted:

- Steve
Image
User avatar
S. Thompson
.
.
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by S. Thompson »

Apparently, there is a lot of misinformation floating around on the internet about which components should be swapped to make the change from guitar to bass micro synth.

Over on freestompboxes.org, a guy said:

C6=2u2 (1u)
C7=1u (0.47u)
C8=0.1u (0.056u)
R62=12k (2k2)

For whatever reason, the component list listed earlier in the thread is wrong.

I think this clears things up for now. Sorry I keep bumping this thread, but I figured I might as well keep track of my progress to help others out in the future.

- Steve
Image
User avatar
avj
A Select Individual
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:54 am
Location: Detroitish.

Post by avj »

No problems on the bumping here, especially since it's to provide clear and proper information on a not-oft discussed topic.

I have been thinking of investigating these modifications for the XO MicroSynth as well, but given the SMD format in the XOs, who knows. I'm sure the layout is drastically different -- hopefully the component values aren't.
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

Aye, mine is the XO version with just the single trimpot on the inside, accessible only by opening it up.
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.