The ones I've played in the shop have been really cool. I'm most interested by them of the classic vibes because my experience with thinline teles in general is pretty limited, I haven't gotten a chance to play many.
Not crazy about the bright maple neck on some of the CVs.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
I'd love some CV Jags, but I don't really see it happening. Blacktop's the closest we'll get, seeing as how a Squier Jag would presumably cost loads due to all the knobs and switches and fancy bridge involved.
A mustang is perhaps possible though (but they're unlikely to bother, due to the CV Duo-Sonic).
PLEASE!!!... Tell Me About the Fuckin' Golf Shoes!
I thought the Duo-Sonic was good enough (or surprising enough, anyway). I've always figured Squier Stangs and Jags with even semi-proper bits on them would be pretty far off but with the introduction of the MIM Jags and Jazzies (Blacktop JM bridge in particular) it may come sooner... probably not CV though.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
Make the Jagmaster bettter than. That guitar is so meh right now, just add it to CV line, and pretend a Hardtail Jag is classic... there we go, no fancy bridge system nada, no ryhtm system fuck it... the CV Duo is not that accurate either.
theshadowofseattle wrote:
Maybe it's not the shemale porn in your post that matters. Maybe it's the shemale porn in your heart.
Lucamo wrote:the CV Duo is not that accurate either.
I'd say it is, apart from the fingerboard specs (which are a big deal for me otherwise I'd have bought a CV of some sort) I'd say other differences are negligible. It's closer to a real Duo than any Squier Mustang or Jaguar would be right now.
A lot of people think the bridge pickup movement is a big deal but given the brightness and snappiness of the CV Duos I'm pretty glad it's not in the vintage position. I don't wanna rock out for just the neighbor's dog.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
I said this in a thread ages ago, the thing that makes perfect sense is 60's student model with a 24" scale. Do it with a rosewood fretboard of course and a hard-tail and that way they don't undercut the Mustang.
Also I think enough time has passed that they could revisit some 90's designs either from the Vista Series or the Jag-Stang, and bring them to the CV line. I know a bunch of kids still get into Nirvana and want Jag-stangs and they cost way too much nowadays for a kid starting out.
Also since they always do a strat, a 70's stratocaster with the big headtsock and maple neck. So people can get their Band of Gypsies/Robin Trower on for cheapz. That'd be a strat re-issue that wouldn't be super tedious.
paul_ wrote:When are homeland security gonna get on this "2-piece King Size Snickers" horseshit that showed up a couple years ago? I've started dropping one of them on the floor of my car every time.
jcyphe wrote:Also since they always do a strat, a 70's stratocaster with the big headtsock and maple neck. So people can get their Band of Gypsies/Robin Trower on for cheapz. That'd be a strat re-issue that wouldn't be super tedious.
jcyphe wrote:Also since they always do a strat, a 70's stratocaster with the big headtsock and maple neck. So people can get their Band of Gypsies/Robin Trower on for cheapz. That'd be a strat re-issue that wouldn't be super tedious.
Yeah I played something similar(if not the same) a few years back and they're not touching the CV series.
paul_ wrote:When are homeland security gonna get on this "2-piece King Size Snickers" horseshit that showed up a couple years ago? I've started dropping one of them on the floor of my car every time.
Lucamo wrote:the CV Duo is not that accurate either.
I'd say it is, apart from the fingerboard specs (which are a big deal for me otherwise I'd have bought a CV of some sort) I'd say other differences are negligible. It's closer to a real Duo than any Squier Mustang or Jaguar would be right now.
A lot of people think the bridge pickup movement is a big deal but given the brightness and snappiness of the CV Duos I'm pretty glad it's not in the vintage position. I don't wanna rock out for just the neighbor's dog.
it's really not accurate at all though. the shape of the body and pickguard are much different. it's based on the 90s duo-sonic which seems to be have been created in some kind of a freehand cut approximation of the original rather than a direct copy. the shape of the orignals, especially the pickguard, look much better IMO.
Mages wrote:
it's really not accurate at all though. the shape of the body and pickguard are much different.
Not saying they got every dimension spot-on, just that they made what is very much a duo-sonic. I've seen a million of those desert sandy '59s over the last 15 years or so and have just now learned, from you, that the body shape and pickguard on the CV is off, and compared pics for the first time. It's quite different directly comparing, but close enough to fool the casual observer.
Plus, they aren't meant to be straight re-issues, so I don't mind them using a bit of MIM Duo specs... there is nothing distinctly "50s" or "60s" about any of the CV guitars at all except cosmetic stuff.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
paul_ wrote:Plus, they aren't meant to be straight re-issues, so I don't mind them using a bit of MIM Duo specs... there is nothing distinctly "50s" or "60s" about any of the CV guitars at all except cosmetic stuff.
yeah that's right.
paul_ wrote:It's quite different directly comparing, but close enough to fool the casual observer.
yeah, that's true. I guess I would say I tend to like the OG ones better but, you are right, the squier is still pretty cool. and for almost everyone it does the trick just fine.
I just mean, they can bend these definitions abit, release a Jagmaster in the CV line, or some half ass'd Tele Deluxe with phoney WRHB's.... but they won't.
I just think they should use the CV line as a experimental ground, if they build any guitar that quality I will consider buying it.
I already own a Duo and now want a Tele deluxe or Thinline.
theshadowofseattle wrote:
Maybe it's not the shemale porn in your post that matters. Maybe it's the shemale porn in your heart.