Bastard child of Les Paul and Jazzmaster...

Grant · Post by **Grant** » Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:12 am

endsjustifymeans wrote:just looks like a pickguardless charvel surfcaster with buckers. In another finish I'd hit it.

I want a 12 string Surfcaster. Too bad they're ridiculously expensive.

edit: Like this one. This finish. This.

holyCATS1415 · Post by **holyCATS1415** » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:08 am

woof. that paint always reminds me of shitty Florida hotel art. or aquariums. that guitar looks awful.

JJLipton · Post by **JJLipton** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:57 am

You need finger extensions to reach those upper frets.

johnnyseven · Post by **johnnyseven** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:04 am

I think my B&B Jazzmaster with humbuckers makes a better Jazzmaster / Les Paul cross.

drBenway · Post by **drBenway** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:23 am

Did not like the look of that. Fender shapes looks wierd in fancy paintjobs and bindings.

My dad's got a fenix tele/"les paul" hybrid that's pretty sick. Looks like this:

(not my pic, not his guitar)
Plays fairly good but the tuners and bridge pretty much suck.

ekwatts · Post by **ekwatts** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:02 pm

In my opinion, any shape looks good with binding, just not all guitars suit both back and front binding. Slap some front-body binding on any Fender shape, be it a strat or a Jaguar, and it looks instantly super classy, and remains comfortable because of the back contouring. Teles work well either way.

chrismakesgod · Post by **chrismakesgod** » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:19 am

I'd rock their SG copy in the mint green with the bigsby.

Infact im fucking buying one with my christmas bonus.

Doug · Post by **Doug** » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:36 pm

I like it. Yeah, would like ergonomic contours. But nice modestly offset shape. In a Fender Neck Amber finish, matching headstock with a maple neck...mmmm, nice.