New Squier Basses for 2011
Moderated By: mods
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
I like the red PJ jag bass!
Also I have a bone to pick with squier's website. Why do all their pictures look like they're poorly photoshopped together rather than like pics of the actual guitars. Is it just me or do all of these pictures of the new guitars look like "let's copy and paste this pickup here, this pickguard here, this knob here, and this fretboard here."
Also I have a bone to pick with squier's website. Why do all their pictures look like they're poorly photoshopped together rather than like pics of the actual guitars. Is it just me or do all of these pictures of the new guitars look like "let's copy and paste this pickup here, this pickguard here, this knob here, and this fretboard here."
- SKC Willie
- Bunk Ass Fuck
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
- Location: Columbia, MO
- Contact:
- damienblair17
- .
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:31 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Its a bass. Plus Jaguar basses aren't that inconic. Plus also, I don't think that many people here own a Jag Bass of any sort or are that attached to that model. Plus that humbucker is sick. If they had done something supercool like that on the guitar models then it might have been a different story too.portugalwillie wrote:So jazzmasters are and jagmasters are offensive because they're ruining the guitars . . .
but throwing a humbucker with 4 knobs a body that kind of looks like a Jaguar is no problem?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95cad/95cada6fcdff57f1d465228d56057972b9a8e299" alt="Image"
Kinda what I was thinkingportugalwillie wrote:So jazzmasters are and jagmasters are offensive because they're ruining the guitars . . .
but throwing a humbucker with 4 knobs a body that kind of looks like a Jaguar is no problem?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15d97/15d97b34e2a52b768d3d1469deebea2ff13d8134" alt="Razz :P"
I'm not a fan of active circuits, so that's a strike against. They've got the Jag name, but only a Jag-like body shape, nothing else... Why call them Jaguars??
That said, I picked up one of the ones released this summer over Christmas and played it in shop... gotta say, it wasn't a bad instrument. It looked better in person than in picture and it felt pretty good. I didn't plug it in, so I won't comment on the electronics, but the P/J combo is one I like in general.
Even the Fender Jaguar Bass, being full scale, without a rhythm circuit, is a bit of a disservice. It wouldn't be too hard, probably, to mod it, I suppose, but not at that price
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15d97/15d97b34e2a52b768d3d1469deebea2ff13d8134" alt="Razz :P"
Donate to Ankhanu Pressekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
- SKC Willie
- Bunk Ass Fuck
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
- Location: Columbia, MO
- Contact:
Rhysyrhys wrote:Its a bass. Plus Jaguar basses aren't that inconic. Plus also, I don't think that many people here own a Jag Bass of any sort or are that attached to that model. Plus that humbucker is sick. If they had done something supercool like that on the guitar models then it might have been a different story too.
But it says Jaguar. If Squier would have called the jazzmaster the stratomaster everyone would have liked. The fact the they took the Jaguar and made into a bass is more of tragedy than adding a strat jack and humbuckers to a guitar.