Pedal project: Modified double muff
Moderated By: mods
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
They're the 2n5088's off of small bear, so I'm guessing it's correct. I can't find the manufacturer name on the transistors themselves.Bill Oakley wrote:Well, I don't see anymore errors. Did you use 2n5088's and did you check the datasheet pin configuration for YOUR 2n5088's. The can vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
Just checked it again and as long as that jumper is right, everything looks right.
Only things I can think of.
1. 5088's have a different pinout.
2. Bad part
3. Hooked up battery wires to the board wrong.
4. Bad connection on your breadboard.
I checked the schematic and your layout with another schematic on the web just to be sure there wasn't an error there. It's right.
Oh, and are you sure you're plugging your guitar in the input and amp in the output. I've mixed that up before and took me hours to figure out what's going on because everything looked right.
If you still can't get it going, I'll try to breadboard it tomorrow and see if it works.
Only things I can think of.
1. 5088's have a different pinout.
2. Bad part
3. Hooked up battery wires to the board wrong.
4. Bad connection on your breadboard.
I checked the schematic and your layout with another schematic on the web just to be sure there wasn't an error there. It's right.
Oh, and are you sure you're plugging your guitar in the input and amp in the output. I've mixed that up before and took me hours to figure out what's going on because everything looked right.
If you still can't get it going, I'll try to breadboard it tomorrow and see if it works.
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
I'm fairly sure that isn't the case, here's a picture of the full board.Mike wrote:I think the problem might be that on your breadboard the continuity is in horizontal chunks, not vertical ones as you seem to be under the impression of, given the way you've aligned the transistors. So currently all your transistor pins look to be connected together.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6684/a6684420a20cfdfe3944cbebdb53bbcb07abbb6e" alt="Image"
For now I think I'm going to borrow my grandpa's multimeter (I should have began with that, but his house is on a hill with a road that is mostly iced over during these months) and see if I have a faulty part. Given how precise current production techniques are I would have never guessed a part would be to blame, but being that I've cross checked my layout with you guys and checked the schematic against others I'm pretty sure that's what it is. Luckily these parts are common enough to pick up at the local radioshack.
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
Just threw it on my breadboard using the Beavis Audio layout and it worked fine.
Can you take a non-blurry picture straight above your breadboard and not at an angle?
My advice would be to take it all off and start again and do it on a different section of your breadboard in case you have a dead spot on your board.
Can you take a non-blurry picture straight above your breadboard and not at an angle?
My advice would be to take it all off and start again and do it on a different section of your breadboard in case you have a dead spot on your board.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
So you're sure it's vertically connected? Test this as the first thing you check with your DMM.wilrecar77 wrote:I'm fairly sure that isn't the case, here's a picture of the full board.Mike wrote:I think the problem might be that on your breadboard the continuity is in horizontal chunks, not vertical ones as you seem to be under the impression of, given the way you've aligned the transistors. So currently all your transistor pins look to be connected together.
-
- .
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:16 am
- Location: Kennewick, WA
- Contact:
Or you can hook up your input and output jacks to the board and see which way signal passes through.Mike wrote:So you're sure it's vertically connected? Test this as the first thing you check with your DMM.wilrecar77 wrote:I'm fairly sure that isn't the case, here's a picture of the full board.Mike wrote:I think the problem might be that on your breadboard the continuity is in horizontal chunks, not vertical ones as you seem to be under the impression of, given the way you've aligned the transistors. So currently all your transistor pins look to be connected together.
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
- wilrecar77
- .
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: North Carolina
Update: Because the muff fuzz alone was lacking in sustain and crunch, I breadboarded an LPB boost to run infront of it and WOW it is much more usable. Way crunchier and with big muff-like sustain. Unless the incoming snowstorm prevents me from borrowing a drill, I should have it in a box by the end of the week. It's like a superfuzz but less gainy and more crunchy with better sustain.