2 Jacks, 1 Guitar

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Empires
.
.
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: All over central Scotland's face
Contact:

2 Jacks, 1 Guitar

Post by Empires »

Caught a bit of Hold Your Horse Is' set in Edinburgh tonight.

Guitarist had an interesting set up...

Image

From what I could see and hear, it was like:

Neck Pickup -> Octave Down -> Amp 1
Bridge Pickup - > Amp 2

Didn't get a chance to see his pedals. I thought it sounded absolutely cracking
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

BOOM
GeorgeF wrote:It's basically just got two outputs. One seperate output does neck pickup which feeds into a JCM800. The other is for the humbucker which feeds into a sub woofer type amp. Has no other volume or tone, switches etc. His pedals consist of a kill switch for the sub and a tuner.
Image
User avatar
Empires
.
.
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: All over central Scotland's face
Contact:

<----- cunt

Post by Empires »

Looks like I was a bit late to the party, then :oops:
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Local H, yadda yadda..

Image
User avatar
shae
teh koolsie
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:32 am
Location: australia

Post by shae »

Hahaha it's the new buzz thing from guitarists it seems.

Personally I like the 'Game Changer' or whatever it was called vs. that. I cannot tell the difference in real time. Definitely more a recording tool.
daphne blew krew
User avatar
Mages
sรƒยบper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

why would it be more of a recording tool? if you're recording it's a piece of piss to overdub multiple parts with different setups and instruments. it's a bit harder when you're playing live, hence why people double things up.
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

But that wouldn't get threads started because of it! Also, I don't know if he's that tech savvy?

It sounds absolutely monstrous live.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

timhulio wrote:As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
Wouldn't that cause all sorts of ungodly ground loop hum, what with the amps sharing the ground connection?

edit: although.. I'm guessing both pickups would be grounded to the bridge anyways?
User avatar
wwrrss
COCKDESTROYER
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:15 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by wwrrss »

might as well just split the signal after the guitar. even less work.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

Would you be able to separate the neck from bridge pickup?
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

Doog wrote:
timhulio wrote:As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
Wouldn't that cause all sorts of ungodly ground loop hum, what with the amps sharing the ground connection?

edit: although.. I'm guessing both pickups would be grounded to the bridge anyways?
Nah I think this is how stereo 345s and Rickenbackers work anyway. Stereo lead into a breakout box. Badda bing, badda boom.
User avatar
wwrrss
COCKDESTROYER
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:15 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by wwrrss »

GeorgeF wrote:Would you be able to separate the neck from bridge pickup?
nah, but I only ever use bridge pickups anyway.
User avatar
Empires
.
.
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: All over central Scotland's face
Contact:

Post by Empires »

Doog wrote:
timhulio wrote:As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
Wouldn't that cause all sorts of ungodly ground loop hum, what with the amps sharing the ground connection?

edit: although.. I'm guessing both pickups would be grounded to the bridge anyways?
There was a massive amount of hum as it was... I thought it was just your bog standard single coil hum but it was pretty nasty.

If he doesn't have some sort of onboard octave down, then that amp he was using for the low end was a beast. I didn't recognise it.
grandnoise
.
.
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:47 am

Post by grandnoise »

I've modded my tele to have separate outputs for each pickup, more for fun than anything, I rarely use them but probably will do at some point for a dry and wet mix.
User avatar
Dingus
.
.
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Post by Dingus »

Doog wrote:Local H, yadda yadda..

Image
Doog beats me to the punch yet again...


Although last time I saw them he was rocking this setup:

Image

That was in '04 though.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Empires wrote:If he doesn't have some sort of onboard octave down, then that amp he was using for the low end was a beast. I didn't recognise it.
I watched a load of live videos, doesn't look or sound like there's an octave pedal in his setup, just a second amp set bassier than the other.. makes the whole "output-per-pickup" seem even more overkill, but I guess you can't argue with results.

Image
I'm guessing this mysterious little box is either a dirt box or just a muting pedal for the 2nd amp..?