Another Gibson thread (sorry) Raw Power

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Another Gibson thread (sorry) Raw Power

Post by Bacchus »

I don't like Gibsons but I've seen these at a local shop and thought they looked cool. Especially like the different un-Gibsoney colours they're offered in. I think a maple board on a Les Paul looks really ugly normally but there's something about these I like. Anyway, I'd not seen them mentioned here so thought I'd throw them up for the sake of completion.

Image

Image
The New Raw Power Guitars From Gibson USA

What’s in a name? When it comes to Gibson’s Raw Power Series, exactly what it declares: two of the world’s most iconic electric guitar designs, stripped of superfluous frills and ready to roar. Inspired by the popular but short-lived Raw Power Les Paul of 2000-2001, the newly revitalized series of 2009 includes both the Les Paul Studio Raw Power and SG Raw Power, both in the dressed-down styling and meaty performance package that so many players loved in the original release, but with notable added features to update the theme.

Down to Business

The new Raw Power guitars follow the no-nonsense ethos of Gibson’s popular Studio series, and their down-to-business looks are packed with performance features that the hard-gigging modern musician will appreciate. These are grab’n’go workhorse guitars for tone-conscious rock and blues artists, and they wear their attitude on their sleeves. Both the Les Paul Studio Raw Power and SG Raw Power feature unbound solid maple bodies, with a traditional carved top on the former. This sturdy tonewood offers a clear, well-defined sonic response, as well as looking great with minimal cosmetic treatment. Their solid mahogany necks are topped with unbound maple fretboards, which are dressed with simple dot position markers, and graced with a traditional trapezoid marker at the 12th fret.

Simple, Yet Sizzling

None of this simplicity means that the Raw Power guitars suffer cosmetically, however, and just like the original Raw Power Les Paul — and the Les Paul Studio — these instruments are destined to be admired for their visual purity as well as for their power and tone. A Natural Satin finish denotes the cornerstone of the series (with smoky acrylic pickguard to enhance the natural elements in these guitars’ tops), but both models are also available in a range of finish options, including Satin Gold, Satin Yellow, Satin White, Satin Blue/Platinum, Satin Trans Ebony, Satin Aquamarine, and Gloss Platinum. Furthermore, the Les Paul Studio Raw Power is available in either chrome or gold-plated hardware.

Ready to Rock

The advanced electronics on the 2009 Raw Power models speak volumes about their intentions. A pair of 57 Classic humbucking pickups offer a broad appeal for a wide range of playing styles. One of Gibson’s most popular pickups of all time, the 57 Classics employ Alnico II magnets, vintage enamel coated wire, nickel-plated pole pieces, nickel slugs, maple spacers and vintage-style, two-conductor, braided wiring, just like the legendary PAFs that they are based on. In a variation from the majority of original PAFs, however, the ’57 Classics’ coils are wax potted to combat microphony and feedback squeal at high volumes so, while vintage voiced, they are also suited to high-gain playing.

Solid to the Core


The Raw Power Series carries a hardware complement that cuts straight to the core of its intentions. The legendary Gibson Tune-O-Matic bridge and stop bar tailpiece pairing aid tuning stability and enhance sustain, while green-key Grover Kluson-style tuners add subtle vintage elegance to their superior performance. A Corian nut helps to ensure excellent resonance and sustain, as well as hitch-free performance. Both guitars feature glued-in necks and are built to Gibson’s traditional 24 3/4" scale length, with a neck width of 1 11/16" at the nut. All Raw Power Series guitars come equipped with a Gibson gig bag, so they’re ready to hit the road and roll.
Image
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post by dezb1 »

The colours are nice but the necks are hideous...
XY
User avatar
Freddy V-C
NOD FLANGERS
Posts: 5591
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm

Post by Freddy V-C »

I'd make sweet musical love to that green SG.
User avatar
rps-10
.
.
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:41 pm
Location: S.E. WALES
Contact:

Post by rps-10 »

The Black LP or the bare SG for me please.
Mike wrote:All my LEDs are bright, the blues are bright as all hell.
mezzio13 wrote:JJ makes sweeps look easy and effortless. His nick name should be broom.
User avatar
Boab
.
.
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:27 pm
Location: Carluke, Near Glasgow, Scotland

Post by Boab »

I like the Greens. Would never get a green guitar though. Certainly not a darkish green.
PLEASE!!!... Tell Me About the Fuckin' Golf Shoes!
User avatar
damienblair17
.
.
Posts: 1069
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by damienblair17 »

I thought these were an April Fools joke last year or something? Guess not if you found one in a store.

The white SG is kinda cool, but eh...
Doog wrote:The perfect marriage of Teh Kurdtz and Teh Durstz.
RUN AMOK!

KESSEL RUN!
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

I really like the natural SG with the tinted see-through pickguard.

Shame about this one having such a terrible join:
Image
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

timhulio wrote:I really like the natural SG with the tinted see-through pickguard.

Shame about this one having such a terrible join:
Image
I was wondering from the pic of all of them lined up if the guard was tranparent! That's pretty cool.
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press
User avatar
Gabriel
.
.
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: NYC

Post by Gabriel »

timhulio wrote:I really like the natural SG with the tinted see-through pickguard.

Shame about this one having such a terrible join:
Image
this is the only one I like, kind of has a vibe of being made out of a coffee table which makes it quite cool.
User avatar
rps-10
.
.
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:41 pm
Location: S.E. WALES
Contact:

Post by rps-10 »

£500 ~ £699 .. nothing I can afford and I doubt they would be that popular with Gibson purisits so there won't be many about secondhand. Guess the odd freak ebay auction may produce one every now and then.

Edit >. take that back, few on ebay, none the right colour option though
Last edited by rps-10 on Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mike wrote:All my LEDs are bright, the blues are bright as all hell.
mezzio13 wrote:JJ makes sweeps look easy and effortless. His nick name should be broom.
User avatar
Freddy V-C
NOD FLANGERS
Posts: 5591
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm

Post by Freddy V-C »

I'll certainly keep an eye out for one of the SGs. I wonder if they'll be closer in quality to Standard or Studio models. I really liked the SG Standard I played, but the LP Studio I played was awful. Played worse than the Encore Strat copy I bought for £30.
User avatar
SGJarrod
.
.
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Location: STL, MO

Post by SGJarrod »

Freddy V-C wrote:I'll certainly keep an eye out for one of the SGs. I wonder if they'll be closer in quality to Standard or Studio models. I really liked the SG Standard I played, but the LP Studio I played was awful. Played worse than the Encore Strat copy I bought for £30.
I would guess closest to the Studio...... it is a stripped down guitar even thou the price does not dictate that for an SG.... You would be much wiser to pic up a SG Standard for nearly the same price....

I have actually never seen one of these in person... I do not think many sold.... I feel finding one used in person would be almost impossible.... maybe the Bay but then u have no idea how it plays.....

I prefer the Yellow but would never get one, I hate Maple fret boards and well if I wanted an awesome all maple axe I would go for the G & L Jerry Cantrell Sig.....

One of the things that makes a SG awesome in my opinion is the Mahogany, warm and mid-rangey....

Edit: I just realized I 2nded alot of what RPS said and even proved one of his points..lol :wink:
lorez wrote: I'm a fuzz lover so my clean is another man's crunch ;)
User avatar
Dave
TOTALLY MODD
Posts: 10439
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:35 pm
Location: UK - Southampton

Post by Dave »

Paul - Is this a cunning reverse April fool? I thought these WERE an april fool last year then everyone is like 'oh yah they're expensive on ebay' I'm like "YOU GUYS! You're running with BP's joke like pros! Bravo!". Then I gave in and looked online

:oops:
iCEByTes wrote:5 Most Jizz face maker Solo�s , classic Rock music i ever listened.
iCEByTes wrote:Blunt a joint , Take the Touch , Listen this.
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

SGJarrod wrote:
Freddy V-C wrote:I wonder if they'll be closer in quality to Standard or Studio models. I really liked the SG Standard I played, but the LP Studio I played was awful. Played worse than the Encore Strat copy I bought for £30.
I would guess closest to the Studio...
Me too 'cause it says Studio on the truss cover. The SG is a Classic.

The original Raw Power was sweet cause it looked Mick Ronson

Image
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Re: Another Gibson thread (sorry) Raw Power

Post by James »

BacchusPaul wrote:Anyway, I'd not seen them mentioned here so thought I'd throw them up for the sake of completion.
Image

You can dooz it if youse tries hards enough
www link
Shabba.
User avatar
Richard
.
.
Posts: 1353
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 4:59 am
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Post by Richard »

Those fretboards are awful. If they were rosewood or ebony instead of maple or had black inlays they'd be much better. Also, why do the natural and blue Les Pauls have that shit gold hardware?

A few of these colors are cool. I like the ugly ass green, the silver/blue burst, and the blue on the LP.
skip wrote:satan rules
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

I didn't realise Gibson could make uglier guitars, but life has it's ways of surprising you.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

timhulio wrote:I really like the natural SG with the tinted see-through pickguard.

Shame about this one having such a terrible join:
Image
One of Gordon Smiths downfalls. Some of the grain matches on theirs are shocking even under stain.

Sorry Paul but these Gibsons are awful. I jest a lot about hating Gibson, i dont, but these suck. Makes you wonder what is going on at Gibbo and Fender these days with some of the shit they are turning out, the same old designs rehashed for the umpteenth time is becoming hilarious.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Fran wrote:One of Gordon Smiths downfalls. Some of the grain matches on theirs are shocking even under stain.
I would say that's especially under the stain. It actually seems to change the value of them on ebay. Badly matched ones tend to go for less than ones where you don't notice it.

As an example, there's this one that went for £190 (plus £25 postage if you can't pick up, but still cheap) and a lot of that I imagine is due to the terrible wood matching.

ebay link

Image

Image
Shabba.
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

paul_ wrote:
SGJarrod wrote:
Freddy V-C wrote:I wonder if they'll be closer in quality to Standard or Studio models. I really liked the SG Standard I played, but the LP Studio I played was awful. Played worse than the Encore Strat copy I bought for £30.
I would guess closest to the Studio...
Me too 'cause it says Studio on the truss cover. The SG is a Classic.

The original Raw Power was sweet cause it looked Mick Ronson

Image
that is a cool guitar.