Gibson Hate

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
SGJarrod
.
.
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Location: STL, MO

Post by SGJarrod »

yarp.... These and Jazzmasters make me HAPPY!!!!

Image

Image
lorez wrote: I'm a fuzz lover so my clean is another man's crunch ;)
User avatar
Dave
TOTALLY MODD
Posts: 10439
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:35 pm
Location: UK - Southampton

Post by Dave »

Knackered Strats look cooler than knackered Les Pauls.
iCEByTes wrote:5 Most Jizz face maker Solo�s , classic Rock music i ever listened.
iCEByTes wrote:Blunt a joint , Take the Touch , Listen this.
JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by JJLipton »

Is that faded lp chambered? Just looks it makes me think about Slash and epic november rain solos.
User avatar
DGNR8
.
.
Posts: 4220
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:51 am
Location: DC Area

Post by DGNR8 »

I owned an SG for about 30 years. I was always worried I was going to scratch it. I needed to get rid of it to know the difference.

I don't know why I gravitate to what I do. I have the rockabilly virus so I lean toward archtops. The elitism is both annoying and alluring. Ric owners seem prissy about them, and Gretsch owners religious. Fender owners are all over the map because there are MOAR of them and big variety. Gibson sticks pretty close to that one trick. I would rather own a few beaters than one good one. Does it feel safer?

BC Rich were legendary in the late 70s, but I was already passing out of classic rock. After Rico sold the company, they targeted the metal niche, which is pretty limited. Music used to be so political. Punks didn't like classic rock hippies and metalheads didn't like punk, etc. I like aspects of all music, but like a little depth.

Thankfully music got open ended. You can like stuff because you LIKE it now. You still may have to pretend to like some things on occasion. Vinyl was a commitment. If you were dropping $12 you'd better want the thing, knowing that every listen meant more dust and scratches.

You can have thousands of MP3s you never even open. You can DL or borrow songs out of curiosity. This doesn't force people to make better music. People make what they make and someone might like it. But better music might go farther and last longer. Old shit music will only get play in grocery stores or for irony in hipster bars.
Yell Like Hell
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

I always thought that the criticism here was mostly tongue in cheek and ironic. You can't deny the good aspects of Gibson designs.

However, I think that there are massive character flaws in some of the designs and they are maybe the things that were addressed in Fender guitars.
Image
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

DGNR8 wrote:I owned an SG for about 30 years. I was always worried I was going to scratch it. I needed to get rid of it to know the difference.

I don't know why I gravitate to what I do. I have the rockabilly virus so I lean toward archtops. The elitism is both annoying and alluring. Ric owners seem prissy about them, and Gretsch owners religious. Fender owners are all over the map because there are MOAR of them and big variety. Gibson sticks pretty close to that one trick. I would rather own a few beaters than one good one. Does it feel safer?

BC Rich were legendary in the late 70s, but I was already passing out of classic rock. After Rico sold the company, they targeted the metal niche, which is pretty limited. Music used to be so political. Punks didn't like classic rock hippies and metalheads didn't like punk, etc. I like aspects of all music, but like a little depth.

Thankfully music got open ended. You can like stuff because you LIKE it now. You still may have to pretend to like some things on occasion. Vinyl was a commitment. If you were dropping $12 you'd better want the thing, knowing that every listen meant more dust and scratches.

You can have thousands of MP3s you never even open. You can DL or borrow songs out of curiosity. This doesn't force people to make better music. People make what they make and someone might like it. But better music might go farther and last longer. Old shit music will only get play in grocery stores or for irony in hipster bars.
Well said.

I always felt uncomfortable gigging with the Gibsons i owned due to value and the fragile angle of that headstock. But to sit with a nice Gibson is a pleasure.
That's partly the trouble though, they dont seem to inspire me to enjoy myself except for the Flying V and i find the serious guitar for serious musicians thing really pretentious. Fender's feel solid and comfortable, the designs and colors are more outgoing as well if that makes any sense? They make me want to have fun with my playing, same with BC Rich, you put a Warlock round your neck and it makes you smile with mischief. Its fun.

I'll buy another Gibson when i'm a miserable old bastard and think i'm better than everybody else.
JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by JJLipton »

Image

You can't look at this pic and tell me you hate Gibsons
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

JJLipton wrote:You can't look at this pic and tell me you hate Gibsons
Sure I can... I'd just be lying.
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press
User avatar
mickie08
.
.
Posts: 6417
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Contact:

Post by mickie08 »

JJLipton wrote:Image

You can't look at this pic and tell me you hate Gibsons
Yeah I can....It's sunburst. Do not want.
They say great minds think alike....Sometimes we do too...
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

Not a reason I dislike Gibson, but what I think is slightly better about Fender: You can lie them flat on the floor.
User avatar
h8mtv
.
.
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:35 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by h8mtv »

I had a friend of mine drop in on me today. He has a Korina V, after lugging it on the road for the last 16 mo he decided he isn't going to use it and I should keep it. What an amazing instrument. I still want an explored tho.
User avatar
Justyn
.
.
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:23 pm
Location: Great Lakes, IL

Post by Justyn »

I like the 60's style necks and I'm partial to a flatter radius and bigger frets. And I like gibson style bridges and humbuckers. And I like Mahogany for a body wood.

Beyond that, I'm not to big on most gibson shapes. The one I got on with the most was an SG and those are really tricky to deal with. Plus their headstock suck and structurally, mahogany is NOT a good neck wood. Snap off city.

If I ever get the scratch, I want a custom Jag from Fender's Custom Shop that combines the best of both worlds
You're standing on my neck
User avatar
Gabriel
.
.
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: NYC

Post by Gabriel »

I adore Gibson archtops, I've probably said that numerous times before. I'd never say no to one of these:

Image

A Wes tribute L5CES. So nice :shock: and equally so expensive.

An L5 is one of my dream guitars too:

Image
User avatar
plaidbeer
.
.
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:59 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by plaidbeer »

Justyn wrote:I like the 60's style necks and I'm partial to a flatter radius and bigger frets. And I like gibson style bridges and humbuckers. And I like Mahogany for a body wood.

Beyond that, I'm not to big on most gibson shapes. The one I got on with the most was an SG and those are really tricky to deal with. Plus their headstock suck and structurally, mahogany is NOT a good neck wood. Snap off city.
How so? Not challenging your statement or anything (I've never had any extensive experience with an SG), but was wondering what you meant.
User avatar
Stuart
.
.
Posts: 1250
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:50 am
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Stuart »

I would love an ES 125 (without the cut away). They are cheaper than other guitars of the same age, but still out of reach at the moment.
obscure pop culture reference
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

That new Les Paul Traditional with a Bigsby that WTR posted is pretty sweet. I think this is still my favourite Les Paul though:

Image
User avatar
Gabriel
.
.
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: NYC

Post by Gabriel »

woah florentine cutaway on that les paul looks amazing.
User avatar
Justyn
.
.
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:23 pm
Location: Great Lakes, IL

Post by Justyn »

plaidbeer wrote:
Justyn wrote:I like the 60's style necks and I'm partial to a flatter radius and bigger frets. And I like gibson style bridges and humbuckers. And I like Mahogany for a body wood.

Beyond that, I'm not to big on most gibson shapes. The one I got on with the most was an SG and those are really tricky to deal with. Plus their headstock suck and structurally, mahogany is NOT a good neck wood. Snap off city.
How so? Not challenging your statement or anything (I've never had any extensive experience with an SG), but was wondering what you meant.
The neck heel joints tend to be finicky and its neck heavy.

Beyond that, I think its a great and practical, if fragile, guitar.
You're standing on my neck
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Maybe its just me but the last lot of guitars posted make me want to get a bus pass. How boring. YAWN.