Way too expensive pawnshop Mustang look-a-like

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
GreenKnee
.
.
Posts: 650
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Sheffield

Post by GreenKnee »

Bound necks look good on any guitar!
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Dave wrote:
goodhonk wrote:bound necks on fenders look cheap, imo.
no
Image
<3
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

I LIKE HOW ALL THE SADDLES ARE EXACTLY IN LINE.

ALMOST LIKE NO CARE WAS TAKEN IN MAKING THE GUITAR!!!!!!!!


TOTALLY WORTH ITTTTTTTT
User avatar
Sidney Vicious
.
.
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:00 am

Post by Sidney Vicious »

plesiosaurus wrote:ugly headstock is ugly
Wow - is it ever! :shock:
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

Dave wrote:
goodhonk wrote:bound necks on fenders look cheap, imo.
no
► Show Spoiler
plus eleven-teen

Image
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
SGJarrod
.
.
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Location: STL, MO

Post by SGJarrod »

((dude))
lorez wrote: I'm a fuzz lover so my clean is another man's crunch ;)
Lupulus
.
.
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:15 am

Fender mustang sucks

Post by Lupulus »

Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
User avatar
laterallateral
Traynor or Death
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am
Location: Montery Howl

Post by laterallateral »

O NO U DIDN'T
Last edited by laterallateral on Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:05 pm; edited 115,726 times in total
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by cur »

Lupulus wrote:Image

Image
Image
User avatar
taylornutt
.
.
Posts: 4908
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by taylornutt »

Lupulus wrote:Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
Dude, thems fighting words around here.
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
User avatar
SKC Willie
Bunk Ass Fuck
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO
Contact:

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by SKC Willie »

Lupulus wrote:Ive had a lupus and it sucked. The herpes gave you unusable rashes. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the condoms were to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Something stupid. The enlarged headstocks was again retarded. The things felt unnatural in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another mistake totally. The lupus have never been popular for a reason.
twitter.com/skcwillie

follow me . . . . you won't
User avatar
Billy3000
.
.
Posts: 3033
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by Billy3000 »

Lupulus wrote:Image
User avatar
Viljami
.
.
Posts: 2004
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:40 pm
Location: TRE, FIN

Post by Viljami »

Lupulus: favorite poster of 2011!
Wild spirit of the Eagle, Black hawk, bird of prey design
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by Mages »

Lupulus wrote:Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
actually in it's day the mustang was one of the most popular guitars fender made. they were one of their most consistent sellers, that's why they kept making them for so many years. you might not like the sounds of a mustang but that's certainly a subjective thing don't you think? most people here would prefer their sound to a humdrum humbucker. don't really know what a "stupid alien lipstick lever" is. I personally quite like the big 70s fender headstocks, to each his own I suppose. I also like .10 strings just fine. any lower than that and I think the tone suffers.

I don't care much for the attention to detail on this fano (or lack there of). the edge routing looks too squared off, the control plate is too thin. the solutions to the mustang "problems" are all rather obvious and boring choices.
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

Lupulus wrote:Image
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
BillClay
.
.
Posts: 1421
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:05 pm

Re: Fender mustang sucks

Post by BillClay »

Lupulus wrote:Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.


BUddy, you sure came to the right place! Welcome home!
AaronGuitarDude
.
.
Posts: 475
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:57 pm
Location: sarawak, malaysia

Post by AaronGuitarDude »

wow, this is becoming a gay thread, no offense for gay people.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

ITT: Fanos guy googles himself.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

AaronGuitarDude wrote:wow, this is becoming a gay thread, no offense for gay people.
douche bag
User avatar
Dave
TOTALLY MODD
Posts: 10439
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:35 pm
Location: UK - Southampton

Post by Dave »

I like gay.

Lupulus is either Fano dude or sock puppet or returned disgruntled ban-ee. Poor hillbilly? Quite funny though.
iCEByTes wrote:5 Most Jizz face maker Solo�s , classic Rock music i ever listened.
iCEByTes wrote:Blunt a joint , Take the Touch , Listen this.