data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0fc9/b0fc9e64e98d17b36eaa2fe4729d2763f01030a8" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6702a/6702add3b1e5262a2a8cf2aa22f198cca1d9f908" alt="Image"
Moderated By: mods
Well said.DGNR8 wrote:I owned an SG for about 30 years. I was always worried I was going to scratch it. I needed to get rid of it to know the difference.
I don't know why I gravitate to what I do. I have the rockabilly virus so I lean toward archtops. The elitism is both annoying and alluring. Ric owners seem prissy about them, and Gretsch owners religious. Fender owners are all over the map because there are MOAR of them and big variety. Gibson sticks pretty close to that one trick. I would rather own a few beaters than one good one. Does it feel safer?
BC Rich were legendary in the late 70s, but I was already passing out of classic rock. After Rico sold the company, they targeted the metal niche, which is pretty limited. Music used to be so political. Punks didn't like classic rock hippies and metalheads didn't like punk, etc. I like aspects of all music, but like a little depth.
Thankfully music got open ended. You can like stuff because you LIKE it now. You still may have to pretend to like some things on occasion. Vinyl was a commitment. If you were dropping $12 you'd better want the thing, knowing that every listen meant more dust and scratches.
You can have thousands of MP3s you never even open. You can DL or borrow songs out of curiosity. This doesn't force people to make better music. People make what they make and someone might like it. But better music might go farther and last longer. Old shit music will only get play in grocery stores or for irony in hipster bars.
Sure I can... I'd just be lying.JJLipton wrote:You can't look at this pic and tell me you hate Gibsons
Donate to Ankhanu Pressekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
How so? Not challenging your statement or anything (I've never had any extensive experience with an SG), but was wondering what you meant.Justyn wrote:I like the 60's style necks and I'm partial to a flatter radius and bigger frets. And I like gibson style bridges and humbuckers. And I like Mahogany for a body wood.
Beyond that, I'm not to big on most gibson shapes. The one I got on with the most was an SG and those are really tricky to deal with. Plus their headstock suck and structurally, mahogany is NOT a good neck wood. Snap off city.
The neck heel joints tend to be finicky and its neck heavy.plaidbeer wrote:How so? Not challenging your statement or anything (I've never had any extensive experience with an SG), but was wondering what you meant.Justyn wrote:I like the 60's style necks and I'm partial to a flatter radius and bigger frets. And I like gibson style bridges and humbuckers. And I like Mahogany for a body wood.
Beyond that, I'm not to big on most gibson shapes. The one I got on with the most was an SG and those are really tricky to deal with. Plus their headstock suck and structurally, mahogany is NOT a good neck wood. Snap off city.