One of my friends in a Wedding Covers Band has one and loves it.
Aesthetically they are like an uncool Fender Performer but im sure they play great and cover 63,000 sonic possibilities whilst having no specific inherent character. Which = guy in a wedding covers band
Yes, the no specific inherent character is why I decided to go over to Jags & JMs for my next purchase.
However I think the Piezo blend probably has some of it's own character. It's a shame because the functionality on the guitar is pretty epic, great Trem, fairly light weight, different looking, good Piezo sounds.
I may get one just for the novelty of having an acoustic sound with some good whammy action. It sounds like ah'm playan slaahhd.
Medicine Melancholy wrote:Yes, the no specific inherent character is why I decided to go over to Jags & JMs for my next purchase.
Depends how you look at that, give Thurston Moore or Brian Molko a Parker Fly to play their back catalogue and you will then know the two Offsets do have a shitload of inherent character. There is not one piece of music ever recorded were you can say "yeah, thats a Parker Fly...", with Jags and Jazzys there is plenty.
I dont want to come across as a twat but its hard to understand until you have owned one.
Yeah, I get you. To be fair most guitars in general are like that, settling for a HH configuration or some Stratty single coils.
It's bothersome because I really want a guitar with a unique sound. Teles have a habit of sounding like Teles at least at low gain, but they're fairly heavily used. May just have to give up on that, guitars with a more unique sound may not be that versatile anyway.
It's made me think though that getting a Coil Split Jag might not be such a bad idea since the "Proper" sound I'm missing out on is pretty much just any other single coil sound anyway. At least with for example the HH Classic Player, you can go in between.
Of course, i could always get the Parker and put unique sounding pickups in them.
Disagree. I can see how it's a departure from the traditional look but there are a lot of bodies I've seen that are just kind of ugly. The EVHs are pushing it. There's something about the ratio of angles to one another. Something looks odd, but "right" about it to me.
The SX SJM is another guitar that's "pushing it", not quite ugly but close.
These guitars are designed for old fatties. There, I said it. Can't play one for more than 45 seconds without wishing I had no nipples or ribs, and that's when I wanted to enjoy them.
I do think that SX SJM thing is pretty ugz, for the same reason I think Parkers are ugz: when designing a body, it's best to have features besides "Fender body shape" and "compromise" in mind.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"