Mustang bodyguard anyone?

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

Mo Law-ka
strictly roots
Posts: 3105
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: a series of tubes

Post by Mo Law-ka »

hotrodperlmutter wrote:that's not a legit fender, bill.

that's clearly just a repro body with vintage parts. notice how the pickguard is square? not fender.

probably a one off.
oh?
Image
jcyphe wrote: Mo is the most sensible person in this thread.
icey wrote:and thats for the hatters (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

Mo Rawka wrote:
hotrodperlmutter wrote:that's not a legit fender, bill.

that's clearly just a repro body with vintage parts. notice how the pickguard is square? not fender.

probably a one off.
oh?
► Show Spoiler
right. that's a legit fender guitar. there's info about it and everything. i'm not saying there never were any.

i'm saying that all the parts on that musicmaster are vintage. the body and pickguard are custom.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

might have been made for a NAMM or something before they launched it.
Image
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

i've read many threads about that guitar before, and no one has ever been able to confirm it's existence as a legit piece or even back up it's illegitimacy. not that it's not, it just doesn't look like it. the neck plate's dated to 77 (iirc from the original auction), and the top horn seems wonky as thom's eye.

all the lucite pieces created for NAMM that i've read about were almost dead on to the originals, and most didn't even have pickguards. the fact that this one has atypical routes, non-lucite neck (maybe this was not feasible if the piece is indeed vintage), the non-yellowed body and that kindergarten pickguard makes me question it as a licensed guitar. i may be wrong, but those are my opinions.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
BillClay
.
.
Posts: 1421
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:05 pm

Post by BillClay »

stewart wrote:might have been made for a NAMM or something before they launched it.
That's what I thought all the lucite models were; one offs to show at conventions of already existing models or prototypes.
gator789
.
.
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:18 am
Location: texas

Post by gator789 »

most of them the foam on th inside has to be replaced....also they werent made with contours....made for the 65's
User avatar
astrozombie
.
.
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:07 pm
Location: Frontier City

Post by astrozombie »

gator789 wrote:most of them the foam on th inside has to be replaced....also they werent made with contours....made for the 65's

fuck
'78 Fender Stang
Fender Jag HH Special

Crybaby>Korg Pitchblack Tuner> Boss SD-1> Boss DS-2> EHx Big Muff Pi>EHx The Clone Theory>
EHx Small Clone> EHx Deluxe Electric Mistress> Boss DD-6> Boss RV-5

Fender Hot Rod Deluxe