Shortscale Classified section looking like a 60's pawnshop!

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
westtexasred
Shortscale Cultural Minister
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Shortscale Classified section looking like a 60's pawnshop!

Post by westtexasred »

I'm selling my '65 Silvertone amp and Pat is selling the matching guitar!

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

$160 for the pair? I'm in!
User avatar
pumpkin
on the road to bantown
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Post by pumpkin »

All you need now is the Electro-Harp.
User avatar
ploppy
.
.
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Wales,UK

Post by ploppy »

89.95 in 1965, what would that cost today?
User avatar
foofoo982
.
.
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:44 pm
Location: Madison, WI/Iowa City, IA

Post by foofoo982 »

ploppy wrote:89.95 in 1965, what would that cost today?
Based on CPI, that'd be about $638.32 in 2011 dollars.
User avatar
westtexasred
Shortscale Cultural Minister
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by westtexasred »

How much did a Fender Jaguar cost in 1965?

Image
User avatar
pumpkin
on the road to bantown
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Post by pumpkin »

1965 price $475
User avatar
westtexasred
Shortscale Cultural Minister
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by westtexasred »

pumpkin wrote:1965 price $475
So that would equal $3,406.76 in today's dollars. Guitars are alot cheaper nowadays.
User avatar
rlm2112
.
.
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:14 am
Location: Ohio (the blue part)
Contact:

Post by rlm2112 »

westtexasred wrote:
pumpkin wrote:1965 price $475
So that would equal $3,406.76 in today's dollars. Guitars are alot cheaper nowadays.
That is hard to believe, honestly. Everything seems way overpriced nowadays.

BTW, who is using the "pumpkin" account?
NJjoanjettfan wrote: Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks to save the originals from wear.
User avatar
westtexasred
Shortscale Cultural Minister
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by westtexasred »

rlm2112 wrote:BTW, who is using the "pumpkin" account?
"6"

Image
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

hopefully it's the same douche using the rlm2112 account.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
DICHOTOMY
BLOWN MINDS
Posts: 4640
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:53 pm

Post by DICHOTOMY »

timhulio wrote:$160 for the pair? I'm in!
haha exactly what i thought.

the amp alone is pretty bitchin. makes me want to start a surf punk band
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

westtexasred wrote:
pumpkin wrote:1965 price $475
So that would equal $3,406.76 in today's dollars. Guitars are alot cheaper nowadays.
or, vintage jaguars are about the same price as they always were, apart from a dip in the punk years.
Image
User avatar
rlm2112
.
.
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:14 am
Location: Ohio (the blue part)
Contact:

Post by rlm2112 »

hotrodperlmutter wrote:hopefully it's the same douche using the rlm2112 account.
lol
NJjoanjettfan wrote: Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks to save the originals from wear.