Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!
Moderated By: mods
-
timhulio
- Redheaded Stepchild
- Posts: 4693
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: London, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by timhulio »
$160 for the pair? I'm in!
-
pumpkin
- on the road to bantown
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Post
by pumpkin »
All you need now is the Electro-Harp.
-
ploppy
- .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c2a/21c2a3abb8ece88658b2346305b9f6627199b4d7" alt=". ."
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:17 pm
- Location: Wales,UK
Post
by ploppy »
89.95 in 1965, what would that cost today?
-
foofoo982
- .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c2a/21c2a3abb8ece88658b2346305b9f6627199b4d7" alt=". ."
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:44 pm
- Location: Madison, WI/Iowa City, IA
Post
by foofoo982 »
ploppy wrote:89.95 in 1965, what would that cost today?
Based on CPI, that'd be about $638.32 in 2011 dollars.
-
westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Post
by westtexasred »
How much did a Fender Jaguar cost in 1965?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f762/0f7620445d9acc8ab0a1effe7177d01798cb1f01" alt="Image"
-
pumpkin
- on the road to bantown
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Post
by pumpkin »
1965 price $475
-
westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Post
by westtexasred »
pumpkin wrote:1965 price $475
So that would equal $3,406.76 in today's dollars. Guitars are alot cheaper nowadays.
-
rlm2112
- .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c2a/21c2a3abb8ece88658b2346305b9f6627199b4d7" alt=". ."
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:14 am
- Location: Ohio (the blue part)
-
Contact:
Post
by rlm2112 »
westtexasred wrote:pumpkin wrote:1965 price $475
So that would equal $3,406.76 in today's dollars. Guitars are alot cheaper nowadays.
That is hard to believe, honestly. Everything seems way overpriced nowadays.
BTW, who is using the "pumpkin" account?
NJjoanjettfan wrote:
Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks to save the originals from wear.
-
westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Post
by westtexasred »
rlm2112 wrote:BTW, who is using the "pumpkin" account?
"6"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3388/b338852d3d1ffaf305ab93fa7009f2b1e07eac02" alt="Image"
-
hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Post
by hotrodperlmutter »
hopefully it's the same douche using the rlm2112 account.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
-
DICHOTOMY
- BLOWN MINDS
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:53 pm
Post
by DICHOTOMY »
timhulio wrote:$160 for the pair? I'm in!
haha exactly what i thought.
the amp alone is pretty bitchin. makes me want to start a surf punk band
-
stewart
- Cunning Linguist
- Posts: 17644
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
-
Contact:
Post
by stewart »
westtexasred wrote:pumpkin wrote:1965 price $475
So that would equal $3,406.76 in today's dollars. Guitars are alot cheaper nowadays.
or, vintage jaguars are about the same price as they always were, apart from a dip in the punk years.
-
rlm2112
- .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c2a/21c2a3abb8ece88658b2346305b9f6627199b4d7" alt=". ."
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:14 am
- Location: Ohio (the blue part)
-
Contact:
Post
by rlm2112 »
hotrodperlmutter wrote:hopefully it's the same douche using the rlm2112 account.
lol
NJjoanjettfan wrote:
Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks to save the originals from wear.