Jag wiring question (switching volume controls around)

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
louis
fuckin' A
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:17 pm
Location: Aylesbury UK

Jag wiring question (switching volume controls around)

Post by louis »

Sup yo,

I'm sure I've asked this before but I can't find the topic/answer so anyway.

My Jag has now become my main guitar (yes, in a metal band, it works), I'm using the neck pickup on the lead circuit but because I have to play mine upside down I'm finding myself knocking the volume/tone knobs when I'm playing. Is there any way of swapping these controls with the ones for the rhythm circuit and leaving everything else as-is?

Image


The actual knobs would then control the rhythm circuit, and the rollers would deal with the Lead.

I'm not going to be doing the work myself as I'm total rubbish with electronics, but I'll pass any info on to the guy I've got in mind to do it.
User avatar
taylornutt
.
.
Posts: 4908
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by taylornutt »

In theory, it's possible. If you are simply changing the locations of the circuits, you would have to find 1M roller pots and 50k normal pots. You would then have to lengthen some of the wires.

What might be an easier solution is to swap the 1M roller pots in the lead circuit for the normal 1m pots and the enlarge the existing pot holes on the control plate to match the ones on the rhythm circuit. It would only require swapping out the pots and enlarging the pot holes to accommodate the rollers.

Image
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

taylornutt wrote:In theory, it's possible. If you are simply changing the locations of the circuits, you would have to find 1M roller pots and 50k normal pots. You would then have to lengthen some of the wires.

What might be an easier solution is to swap the 1M roller pots in the lead circuit for the normal 1m pots and the enlarge the existing pot holes on the control plate to match the ones on the rhythm circuit. It would only require swapping out the pots and enlarging the pot holes to accommodate the rollers.

Image
At first I was like WAHT TEH FUCK? to this response, but then I looked again and thought about it some more, and honestly its absolutely brilliant. Why the fuck don't they do this for all guitars??
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
taylornutt
.
.
Posts: 4908
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by taylornutt »

Pens wrote:
taylornutt wrote:In theory, it's possible. If you are simply changing the locations of the circuits, you would have to find 1M roller pots and 50k normal pots. You would then have to lengthen some of the wires.

What might be an easier solution is to swap the 1M roller pots in the lead circuit for the normal 1m pots and the enlarge the existing pot holes on the control plate to match the ones on the rhythm circuit. It would only require swapping out the pots and enlarging the pot holes to accommodate the rollers.

Image
At first I was like WAHT TEH FUCK? to this response, but then I looked again and thought about it some more, and honestly its absolutely brilliant. Why the fuck don't they do this for all guitars??
I recently was rewiring my Jaguar HH and I can't imagine trying to swap the circuit locations, but even swapping the circuits doesn't fix the problem he is having with the knobs being in the way. This solution keeps the electronics in the same place but actually addresses the issue Louis wants to fix. You could also recess the switches with washers if they get in the way.
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
User avatar
SKC Willie
Bunk Ass Fuck
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO
Contact:

Post by SKC Willie »

-insert learn to play guitar the correct way comment here-
twitter.com/skcwillie

follow me . . . . you won't
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

portugalwillie wrote:-insert learn to play guitar the correct way comment here-
ha ha

i know, i was trying not to be a dick but i had a dr. steve brule moment:

IF YOU'RE TURNING OFF YOUR VOLUMES ON YOUR GUITAR, AND YOU'RE PLAYING THE GUITAR UPSIDE DOWN, JUST TURN YOUR GUITAR OVER YOU TURKEY!
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
louis
fuckin' A
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:17 pm
Location: Aylesbury UK

Post by louis »

taylornutt wrote:
Pens wrote:
taylornutt wrote:In theory, it's possible. If you are simply changing the locations of the circuits, you would have to find 1M roller pots and 50k normal pots. You would then have to lengthen some of the wires.

What might be an easier solution is to swap the 1M roller pots in the lead circuit for the normal 1m pots and the enlarge the existing pot holes on the control plate to match the ones on the rhythm circuit. It would only require swapping out the pots and enlarging the pot holes to accommodate the rollers.

Image
At first I was like WAHT TEH FUCK? to this response, but then I looked again and thought about it some more, and honestly its absolutely brilliant. Why the fuck don't they do this for all guitars??
I recently was rewiring my Jaguar HH and I can't imagine trying to swap the circuit locations, but even swapping the circuits doesn't fix the problem he is having with the knobs being in the way. This solution keeps the electronics in the same place but actually addresses the issue Louis wants to fix. You could also recess the switches with washers if they get in the way.
hmm, may look into this, cheers dude.
User avatar
GreenKnee
.
.
Posts: 650
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Sheffield

Post by GreenKnee »

I think it actually looks kind of nice upside down.

It's like a much hotter supersonic
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022402
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

taylornutt wrote:In theory, it's possible. If you are simply changing the locations of the circuits, you would have to find 1M roller pots and 50k normal pots. You would then have to lengthen some of the wires.

What might be an easier solution is to swap the 1M roller pots in the lead circuit for the normal 1m pots and the enlarge the existing pot holes on the control plate to match the ones on the rhythm circuit. It would only require swapping out the pots and enlarging the pot holes to accommodate the rollers.

Image
weird, but cool.
User avatar
serfx
ss.o bastard son
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:34 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Contact:

Post by serfx »

taylornutt wrote:Image
i like the concept, but i'm not sure if you could modify the round holes to work for rollers very easily.. or more so without it looking odd..

however if you have a machinist friend.. could be totally killer
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

you wouldn't have to machine anything. some patience, a dremel, and a drill press (for the holes for roller pot chassis mount) and about an hours time would get you pretty close.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.