GFS bass models out. CHEEP.

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
ultratwin
The 25.5" subversion
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:47 pm
Location: Seoul

GFS bass models out. CHEEP.

Post by ultratwin »

A_saVANT
.
.
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:28 pm
Location: Florida

Post by A_saVANT »

User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

Looks like you can cut/sand that little point on the headstock and make it into a fendery shape if you're ocd about headstocks.

Looks like a pretty good value for an instrument, just wish the necks were finished like a Squier CV
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

The vintage white with maple (particularly on the P) is the sex.
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press
User avatar
ultratwin
The 25.5" subversion
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:47 pm
Location: Seoul

Post by ultratwin »

Ankhanu wrote:The vintage white with maple (particularly on the P) is the sex.
That's the one I'd get as well. Though it's on the vanilla custard side of the spectrum, add a black or anodized gold guard and you're good to go.
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

I would totally touch them.
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

I find the SX basses a smarter buy than these or the CVs.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

I don't think any of them are a bad buy per say, but I still think it's hard to top a Squier CV for overall value for around $300. They also hold their resale value better than the other two, and you can swap parts with a fender without worry.
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

paul_ wrote:I find the SX basses a smarter buy than these or the CVs.
even with the gash headstocks they have now? i'm glad they do shortscales in classic designs, but cannot. get. over. the. headstock.

these are pretty nice looking, but yeah, the Classic Vibe stuff is just dead on. these just look like copies.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
jcyphe
.
.
Posts: 16888
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:18 am

Post by jcyphe »

paul_ wrote:I find the SX basses a smarter buy than these or the CVs.
I like when SX had those basses with the ridiculously big take on the 70's style headstock. It looked like something from CBS's reject bin, which is saying something.
User avatar
Billy3000
.
.
Posts: 3033
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Atlanta

Post by Billy3000 »

I've only ever played or seen a couple sx guitars and basses in person before. But every one that I've had the chance to pick up and play for a bit has been ridiculously heavy and not felt like it was very good quality. I definitely wouldn't go anywhere near putting it in the same category as the squier CV's. Squier CV is a budget line that plays, feels and sounds like a professional, expensive instrument. Nothing below $400 compares to them IMO.
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

Billy3000 wrote:I've only ever played or seen a couple sx guitars and basses in person before. But every one that I've had the chance to pick up and play for a bit has been ridiculously heavy and not felt like it was very good quality. I definitely wouldn't go anywhere near putting it in the same category as the squier CV's. Squier CV is a budget line that plays, feels and sounds like a professional, expensive instrument. Nothing below $400 compares to them IMO.
With the recent waves of fender price hikes I'd say hardly anything under $600 compares to them.
User avatar
Billy3000
.
.
Posts: 3033
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Atlanta

Post by Billy3000 »

Nick wrote:
Billy3000 wrote:I've only ever played or seen a couple sx guitars and basses in person before. But every one that I've had the chance to pick up and play for a bit has been ridiculously heavy and not felt like it was very good quality. I definitely wouldn't go anywhere near putting it in the same category as the squier CV's. Squier CV is a budget line that plays, feels and sounds like a professional, expensive instrument. Nothing below $400 compares to them IMO.
With the recent waves of fender price hikes I'd say hardly anything under $600 compares to them.
I completely agree. The squier CV's have always felt on par with the higher model fenders to me. The CV p basses came out right after I bought my MIA fender p bass, and I remember playing them for the first time and thinking that if they had been out I would have probably bought one of those instead of the fender!
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

back to six strings for a sec... i did a side-by-side/playing comparison of the AVRI '62 tele and a CV 60's custom tele at CME, and the squire won out overall. we're talking $1000 difference in price. the AVRI had nicer grain, but who gives a fuck about that when you consider the differential.

CV anything for the win, really.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

shit colors
dots wrote:incesticide