Ordered today. I'll let ya know if the boy passed on the guitar for xmas.endsjustifymeans wrote:Lol, future dibs if I don't buy one by then.Pens wrote:Define "fucked".
I'm ordering the LPB tonight. My son hasn't given a definitive answer if he wants it or not, so if he doesn't I'll be reselling it on here.
Squier Making The Cyclone Again .
Moderated By: mods
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
lalzFran wrote:I'm also at this point, only took me 15 years to wake up..dots wrote:it took me a while to break that habit, too. i was always changing out electronics, pick guards, tuners, etc. . . i finally figured out that (a) there are guitars out there stock with the options i was addingekwatts wrote:I'd only want the Cyclone to mod and mod and mod, and I'm trying to get out of that a little bit.
The other day i realized very little i own is stock and most of it is temperamental in some way or other. I even considered selling a shitload of stuff and just buying one decent functional guitar that is reliable.
Having said that i'll probably buy one of these and fit an EMG in it, roller nut, grovers...
I have my Batwing, Nu-Sonic, Alden Gaudycaster Hollowbody, Jaguar and my Danelectro. Of all of those the ones I've modified extensively are the Jaguar and the Nu-Sonic. Well, I've modified the Batwing by adding string trees which were curiously absent from mine while present on every other example I've seen (and I installed ROLLER TREES! Because everything is better when it has rolly wheels) but it's otherwise perfect in its stock form; the pickups and pickup options, the trem, the neck, the shape, it's all pretty much spot-on. I'm constantly eye-ing up potential upgrades, but they tend to be things like the Hipshot tremsetter, new bridge saddles (with ROLLY WHEELS!) or something like that.
That's why I'm more excited about the idea of picking up the Mascis Jazzy. There's just so little about it I can think of that I'd want to change. Maybe a new drop-in replacement bridge (with ROLLY WHEELS!) and maybe a Fender trem with the lock button, but that's about it. Even the pickups would probably remain the same.
I still wouldn't pass up the Cyclone if it was thrown at me, though.
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
IIRC, the fenders had perfectly good necks. The squier I played was that "satin" (aka unfinished) and all hard edges and barbed wire frets.Supersonicman wrote:The original run had perfectly good necks, and I definitely love the neck on my 2003 cyclone, which was many times better than the MIM Strat of the same make year I traded for it.hotrodperlmutter wrote:it felt like plastic. just like those single humbucker bullets from years back. white wood, shitty rosewood, gnarfrets, and shit tuners. only good for firewood, and they smell like burning hair when on fire.
sounds like a great beginner guitar if they can straighten the neckfail.
Also it sounded like a bucket of nails.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
- endsjustifymeans
- Grown Up Punk
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
- Location: Ball So Hard University
- endsjustifymeans
- Grown Up Punk
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
- Location: Ball So Hard University
Not too difficult, but when paying for a finished product, one expects a finished product.brainfur wrote:how hard is it to sand + add coats of gloss lacquer to a satiny neck? that and some fret filing should be enough to fix any cheap squier neck, no?
dots wrote:society is crumbling because of asshoels like ends
brainfur wrote:I'm having difficulty reconciling my desire to smash the state & kill all white people with my desire for a new telecaster
Also, re finsihing is actually really tie consuming, and hard to do niceley, IMO. Also its best to hav specialized tools to dress frets. Even with them, I worked for a good hour on a set of frets that were "almost there"endsjustifymeans wrote:Not too difficult, but when paying for a finished product, one expects a finished product.brainfur wrote:how hard is it to sand + add coats of gloss lacquer to a satiny neck? that and some fret filing should be enough to fix any cheap squier neck, no?
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
-
- .
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:36 pm
I was actually talking about the 2003 Squier Cyclone, not the fender version. The neck on it is great, and I love that thing to death. It plays better than my Jag-stang.aen wrote:IIRC, the fenders had perfectly good necks. The squier I played was that "satin" (aka unfinished) and all hard edges and barbed wire frets.Supersonicman wrote:The original run had perfectly good necks, and I definitely love the neck on my 2003 cyclone, which was many times better than the MIM Strat of the same make year I traded for it.hotrodperlmutter wrote:it felt like plastic. just like those single humbucker bullets from years back. white wood, shitty rosewood, gnarfrets, and shit tuners. only good for firewood, and they smell like burning hair when on fire.
sounds like a great beginner guitar if they can straighten the neckfail.
Also it sounded like a bucket of nails.
I'm surprised there's some haters on the Squier ... Great guitars for the most part . I've played the Squier and the Fender version Cyclones( early 2000s. Not back to back but played both ) . Both play great . Both play surprisingly different . I thought the pickups sucked on the Squier but the neck was better . Matter of opinion . I like the satin. I sanded the neck on my Mustang slightly for the effect .
I'm expecting a good guitar with a good neck and shitty electrics . Pickups and pots are so much easier and cheaper to beef up than a bad neck..... Opinion...
I'm expecting a good guitar with a good neck and shitty electrics . Pickups and pots are so much easier and cheaper to beef up than a bad neck..... Opinion...
- taylornutt
- .
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
You will find lots of love for Squier here. Just the previous Squier Cyclones were not very good for some people. Considering Squier's recent improvements, I am betting they will be decent.
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
-
- .
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:36 pm
Weird, because my cyclone(squier) is actually number two in sound and playability in my guitar selection, and is definitely there to either provide the balls that my tele may lack at times, or just as a straight up back up to my cvc.Rox wrote:I'm surprised there's some haters on the Squier ... Great guitars for the most part . I've played the Squier and the Fender version Cyclones( early 2000s. Not back to back but played both ) . Both play great . Both play surprisingly different . I thought the pickups sucked on the Squier but the neck was better . Matter of opinion . I like the satin. I sanded the neck on my Mustang slightly for the effect .
I'm expecting a good guitar with a good neck and shitty electrics . Pickups and pots are so much easier and cheaper to beef up than a bad neck..... Opinion...
-
- .
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 2:41 am
- Location: Seattle
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA