I so wish I would have grabbed one when they were being blown out at $299 on Fender friday years ago.honeyiscool wrote:They're only like $499 used from GC online. I grabbed one myself yesterday.
Considering Vista Jagmasters get listed at $500+ on eBay...
Production Jaguar variations
Moderated By: mods
- endsjustifymeans
- Grown Up Punk
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
- Location: Ball So Hard University
dots wrote:society is crumbling because of asshoels like ends
brainfur wrote:I'm having difficulty reconciling my desire to smash the state & kill all white people with my desire for a new telecaster
I still have to properly go through the Reissues and find what's what, so they're not really included yet, but, this is the spreadsheet I've pulled together so far for specs... I recognize that I have the ABC widths mixed with C "shape" for necks... and I'll be probably adding info on tuners, neck cuts, slab vs. vaneer fretboards, and the small detail changes in the 60s with pickups, decals and the like. (also have to translate the Johnny Marr features into the spreadsheet notes)
Donate to Ankhanu Pressekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
- honeyiscool
- .
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
- Location: San Diego, California
Great work so far!
Just so you know, the Modern Player specs sheet is wrong. It clearly has 22 frets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/367b6/367b6fcc99fd907adc817be39760d0a49f12f24f" alt="Image"
Second, I think you should change the headstock column to matching, black, or natural to differentiate between those with matching headstocks and those with mismatched headstocks.
Just so you know, the Modern Player specs sheet is wrong. It clearly has 22 frets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/367b6/367b6fcc99fd907adc817be39760d0a49f12f24f" alt="Image"
Second, I think you should change the headstock column to matching, black, or natural to differentiate between those with matching headstocks and those with mismatched headstocks.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
Good eye.
Yeah, I was thinking about the headstock color thing while setting up the sheet... but wasn't sure whether to add in that data as a separate column, or change the column to say something like Painted Headstock and have No, Matching, Black or the like... with the caveat that (AFAIK) no 3TS finishes have painted heads.
Yeah, I was thinking about the headstock color thing while setting up the sheet... but wasn't sure whether to add in that data as a separate column, or change the column to say something like Painted Headstock and have No, Matching, Black or the like... with the caveat that (AFAIK) no 3TS finishes have painted heads.
Donate to Ankhanu Pressekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
I demand proof, or all this is just internet jibber-jabber. Because I think you're wrong, see.Thomas wrote:Yeah the 90s-2000 ones were def all Basswood apart from the ones with trans finishes.
ITT: overstatement. The trem units weren't quite so beefy, is all.honeyiscool wrote:... the real problem was the cheap, inferior, inaccurate hardware.
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
Ah, the good old days, when you could score one on ebay for £280.Thomas wrote:All of the Jaguars I've bought secondhand played like crap cos at the time the guitars weren't as popular and most folk that had them couldn't set them up properly (esp the trem). I reckon that's a reason a lot of people used to think they weren't great guitars. That meant they were cheap and could be brought up to speed in about half an hour.
The japanese offsets from the 90s were great.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/526cf/526cf866545462d3c6309bc42e2bf0604ac7eb05" alt="Crying or Very sad :cry:"