changing jaguar pots

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

mcboyle
.
.
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 7:44 pm

changing jaguar pots

Post by mcboyle »

I'm looking to change the pots in my 1994 jaguar. Does anyone have any suggestions on which route to take with that?
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

Why do you want to change them? Make or value?
mcboyle
.
.
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 7:44 pm

Post by mcboyle »

Well I figure its the cheapest way to improve the tone of the guitar and get some more clarity. I'm the second owner and pretty positive they've never been changed. I was reading that cts make some quality stuff. I guess I just am confused about which value to go for. And what the difference a 250k pot vs a 500k pot will make and so on.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

If they are still stock, then you will have 1 Meg pots in the Jag. If you swap to a lower value like 500k it will let less high end through, and 250k even more so. If you want to make your Jag darker then it's certainly one way of doing so. Personally I think just turning down your tone knob will have the same effect.
User avatar
kypdurron
.
.
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Kaiser Wilhelm Kuntry

Post by kypdurron »

I second that. Pots are important, but that's mostly about their electric value. I don't think there's a noticeable tonal difference with same value different manufacturer pots. But if you feel better, do so. It doesn't cost the world to find out if I'm right.
Obi Wan says: The Jundland Wastes are not to be traveled lightly.

strat-talk says: Shortscale is a crazy place. There seems to be no rules at all and they're all insane!
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

kypdurron wrote:I second that. Pots are important, but that's mostly about their electric value. I don't think there's a noticeable tonal difference with same value different manufacturer pots. But if you feel better, do so. It doesn't cost the world to find out if I'm right.
+1 :wink:
mordechaister
.
.
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:57 am

Post by mordechaister »

Depends what you mean by clarity. Lacking in highs? If they're 1 meg, then changing to another brand of 1 meg wont do much. I've seen 2 meg pots. You may want to change all the wiring and caps too. Remember when wiring that finer wire gauge has a lower capacitance so that will in theory give you more highs in a way. There is definitely something to be said for a clean wiring job with nice materials and components, even if all it does is give you a sense of accomplishment and make you feel better about whats inside your guitar.
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

Yeah, a Jaguar is a clear, bright guitar by design... If you're not getting clarity, something is wrong, and it's probably not the pots, unless they HAVE been swapped out for a lower value pot in the past. You might want to take a peek at the wiring, make sure everything looks clean. Is the rhythm circuit stuck on??
As a '94, if the pickups are stock, they're not the greatest, and might be a more effective place to start. Dungan SJAG-1 or Fender American Vintage '62 Reissue pickups are a good starting point, but there are other good options from Novak, among others.
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

CTS pots won't fit a Japanese Jaguar without enlarging the control plates' holes and using a different bracket/roller knobs in the rhythm circuit section. I would only replace them if your existing ones sound scratchy or make static-type noises when you turn them, and even then I'd use Alphas to avoid the headache/cost/sourcing of parts associated with imperializing a metric instrument.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
jim93
.
.
Posts: 2098
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:52 am

Post by jim93 »

kypdurron wrote:I second that. Pots are important, but that's mostly about their electric value. I don't think there's a noticeable tonal difference with same value different manufacturer pots. But if you feel better, do so. It doesn't cost the world to find out if I'm right.
CTS pots are tonez for days. Only second to some NOS pots