Multi-effects question...
Moderated By: mods
Multi-effects question...
After the Johnny Marr Jag post; I had a look at his stage gear and saw that he uses a Boss GT-5, and I know that one of my other heroes Will Sergeant uses an old boss me-10. So what’s the SS view on Multi FX?
Last edited by dezb1 on Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XY
- onedaycloser
- .
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:33 pm
- Location: Wv, USA.
- Contact:
I've had a Boss ME-70 for a few years, while it's a good over all unit, there's some things I just prefer to get from single pedal units. The distortion/od samples it contains are certainly lacking, the fuzz especially.
I found I only really use 3-5 effects at most within the pedal and I have those served in individual units anyway.
I found I only really use 3-5 effects at most within the pedal and I have those served in individual units anyway.
My only real aversion to them comes from being locked into all the sounds inside. Comparing different multi-fx pedals you'll see some excel in different areas. A single pedal will rarely have the best of everything, so you might prefer one brand's distortions, another brand's modulations, and so on. If you like the sounds of the effects you actually use the most, and the other stuff is just there to play and experiment with, then I'd say it's a pretty good setup, and definitely lightens the load and reduces setup time. But if you're one of those players who tries to assemble their pedal boards with the best of each effect they can find or afford, it might leave you a bit frustrated.
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
I'm sure Marr said he only uses them for time, modulation and comp.
I like them on the whole and use them exclusively at home but they always seem to fall short on the Gain sections. Although i have found if you tame the drive on them they can work well playing live with a decent amp.
The Digitech RP250 is an interesting one because it is actually a pedal modeller (Rat, D+, TS, etc.) and quite accurate as well. Plus you have all the extra's like modulation, time, whammy, wah and compression. The one thing i hate about it is you have to press both pedals at the same time to bypass/engage the tuner and because it is sensitive touching one pedal first can shoot you through a load of patches in a split second.
Out of the bunch of brands i think Line 6 have mastered the Gain sections best.
I like them on the whole and use them exclusively at home but they always seem to fall short on the Gain sections. Although i have found if you tame the drive on them they can work well playing live with a decent amp.
The Digitech RP250 is an interesting one because it is actually a pedal modeller (Rat, D+, TS, etc.) and quite accurate as well. Plus you have all the extra's like modulation, time, whammy, wah and compression. The one thing i hate about it is you have to press both pedals at the same time to bypass/engage the tuner and because it is sensitive touching one pedal first can shoot you through a load of patches in a split second.
Out of the bunch of brands i think Line 6 have mastered the Gain sections best.
my reaction like all of your's is that i don't like them for all the reasons listed (and I bought one of thoes crap Zoom multi fx things in the 90's which made me think never again), but after reading a bit about them i'm thinking that something like the me-20 combined with a good overdrive pedal might be a good portable gigging tool.
XY
The Line 6: M-9/13, gets a great rap round here. I've used one and they are really, really awesome. I've used a few others that I've liked - the Vox tonelab SE was great, the Korg one was good, the boss and roland ones are really good if you use them right, but fairly standard if you want to use them in front of a tube amp. It's kind of a different deal: some are good for modelling and being run with the 4 cable config, some emulate there single pedal brethren and want to be run in front of an amp.
I think they are great, used correctly.
I think they are great, used correctly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95cad/95cada6fcdff57f1d465228d56057972b9a8e299" alt="Image"
£40, it would be rude not to. Are the effects the same as in the pedals? For the delays it must be worth that alone if that is the casedezb1 wrote:just bought a boss me-20 (£40) if I don't like it I'll put it back on the bay...
plopswagon wrote:I like teles and strats because they're made out of guitar.
robroe wrote:I dont need a capo. I have the other chords in my tonefingers
- gypsyseven
- .
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
- Location: Germany
I was a little skeptical about multis after reading negative comments about them when I was considering my first pedals to buy, but Doog's M9 vids here made me reconsider. I then tried out the M9 a couple times in a GC and found that I really liked it. It didn't replace all my pedals--I use it for delay, reverb, and some modulation, but the drive effects (other than the high-gain stuff) aren't bad.
I sold my modulation, reverb, and delay pedals and use this in their place alongside my drive pedals. I still have a CE-2 and DE7, but only really because the M9 can't replicate the CE-2 and the DE-7 just to have as an extra delay (and it was pretty cheap). Lots of people on HCFX have an M-series multi and seem to really like them.
I sold my modulation, reverb, and delay pedals and use this in their place alongside my drive pedals. I still have a CE-2 and DE7, but only really because the M9 can't replicate the CE-2 and the DE-7 just to have as an extra delay (and it was pretty cheap). Lots of people on HCFX have an M-series multi and seem to really like them.
gypsyseven wrote:MultiFx´s always took too much time tweaking around than playing my guitar....
I rock a good few pedals - I'm always tweaking and messing around with different sounds. Its a big part of the fun. If you want to play guitar clean, just plug into an amp - otherwise spend the time designing cool sondz.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95cad/95cada6fcdff57f1d465228d56057972b9a8e299" alt="Image"
- gypsyseven
- .
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
- Location: Germany
Absolutely, but i rather use just a bunch of decent pedals...Rhysyrhys wrote:gypsyseven wrote:MultiFx´s always took too much time tweaking around than playing my guitar....
I rock a good few pedals - I'm always tweaking and messing around with different sounds. Its a big part of the fun. If you want to play guitar clean, just plug into an amp - otherwise spend the time designing cool sondz.
[quote="Doog"]Another of life's great mysteries solved.
Next week: where does my room go when I turn off the lights?
Next week: where does my room go when I turn off the lights?
- taylornutt
- .
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
I always found multi FX to have too many options and was never comfortable using them. My Line 6 DL4 is the only digital Multi-effect pedal I like. I like to physically see the knobs and settings for each pedal. It's odd because I am a geeky computer nerd, but I really prefer mostly analog guitar pedals to digital MultiFX.
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
- Freddy V-C
- NOD FLANGERS
- Posts: 5591
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm
-
- .
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
- Location: London, England
I've been put off multi-effects ever since I had a Zoom 505 in the 90's. I guess technology has moved on since then though but i've never had the opportunity or desire to investigate. I like the idea of the Line 6 M9/13 but reports of people having them and still using stompbox OD/Dist/Fuzz pedals would kind of defeat the object of me having one.