it's just a phase

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

it's just a phase

Post by kim »

i've been a total fu manchu fangirl again lately...

so now i've been looking at mxr phase 100's..quasar, maxon, small stone, moon phase, polyphase..


seems the phase 100 would be a good option for phase mainly used on overdrive and distorted sounds..to get that 'driving' kind of sound that rides on top of riffage...

you say ?





oh and off topic...i scored my fulltone ultimate octave back... for only €100 ! and it's on its way to me together with a red witch famulus which i scored cheap too... yessss. awesome seller.
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

Lorez has a Nano Small Stone up for grabs in the Classifieds. T'was mine previously and was really quite good.

No volume drop like the bigger box version.
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

it's not for straightaway..i've spent too much on gear the past few weeks. xD

which gives me more time to compare different brands and models for a while and make up my mind.

i have an old digitech xp200 which does modulation like flangers, phasers, chorus, trem etc.. but it's fucking huge and needs its own power..
johnnyseven
.
.
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: London, England

Post by johnnyseven »

The MXR custom shop phasers are really good. I didn't like the phase 100 I had.
User avatar
Rhysyrhys
The Kraken
Posts: 3152
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:24 pm
Location: California

Post by Rhysyrhys »

I know that this seems to be a fairly generic answer round here for most pedal queries, but have you considered an Line 6 M5? I reckon it would sort out your modulation needs.
Image
User avatar
wwrrss
COCKDESTROYER
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:15 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by wwrrss »

I have a DOD stereo phaser that's pretty good and I picked up for really cheap.
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

what didn't you like about the phase 100 ? there's script logo mxr 90's and bolt logo mxr 90's...i've no fucking idea, i'm not looking to blow 200/300 on a phaser, just need something simple and just 'classic'. ..oh and small. i'm familiar with the volume drop on ehx but it's said the nano's don't have it. mainly looking for a stoner rock driven kind of phasing no funky 70's guitar phasing/flangering.
Ben79
.
.
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Brixton, London

Post by Ben79 »

I had the old Sovtek phaser which was a rich and warm and good with dirt. This was some time ago, before I knew pedals could be fixed, so when it stopped working I just threw it away! They seem to go for about 70 euros on ebay, don't think you could go far wrong with one of those or a phase 90.
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

sovtek is forever associated with some scumbag i'm not naming. lol

i believe you though..just my principles.

why'd you recommend a phase 90 over 100 ? specific differences ?
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

kim wrote:sovtek is forever associated with some scumbag i'm not naming. lol
Lolwut, who, I'm curious?
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

not saying on a public forum franmannn. :wink:
Ben79
.
.
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Brixton, London

Post by Ben79 »

Putin? Gorbachov? Yeltsin? Mike Matthews? Surely a secondhand one can't be feeding any of these greedy fascists....

Just heard a phase 90 once and thought it sounded great - perhaps a little more transparent than a SS. The phase 100 has more poles, it also has a depth control. I personally like the idea of a fixed depth - having to work within the limits of the equipment. The SS just has a switch but I guess it could be pretty easily modded to take a pot? That's coming from someone with almost no knowledge of electronics though.
Last edited by Ben79 on Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

lol no something too personal, i've said too much already, knock it offf ! hahaha. :P
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

I've got the script phase 90 and I think it's really nice. I had the nano small stone at the same time to A/B them and liked the MXR more. Strangely I like the big box Small Stone as the volume drop is useful if you want stuff to kick in when you switch off the phase.
There's a phase 90 that has had the script mod done for sale on the BKP forum at the moment for £55 + shipping.
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

My bandmate is using the MXR Phase 90 and we all like what he´s getting out of it.... :wink:
[quote="Doog"]Another of life's great mysteries solved.

Next week: where does my room go when I turn off the lights?
User avatar
thickarms
.
.
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:06 pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Post by thickarms »

I've used the Phase 90, Phase 100 and Small Stone a fair amount. I'm not entirely sure my reasoning for this, just my instinct when I here them but I generally prefer the 90 to the 100, seems a bit more subtle

Small Stone always wins it for me though, sounds amazing fuzzed up and a lot kinder on the wallet
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

see i'm not particularly after 'subtle' i want liquid sounding driven C tuning things.. but hmm...

the script one and regular one phase 90 show up regularly, new there's a price diff of 20/30 euros.. i should just go and test them..problem is..shops here, are rare, and stock boring gear, didn't even find those pedals ! total. shithole.
johnnyseven
.
.
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: London, England

Post by johnnyseven »

kim wrote:what didn't you like about the phase 100 ? there's script logo mxr 90's and bolt logo mxr 90's...i've no fucking idea, i'm not looking to blow 200/300 on a phaser, just need something simple and just 'classic'. ..oh and small. i'm familiar with the volume drop on ehx but it's said the nano's don't have it. mainly looking for a stoner rock driven kind of phasing no funky 70's guitar phasing/flangering.
It had a tone which was a touch too trebly for my liking, it sounded slightly harsh on the ears. I was playing it after drive though so I don't know if putting before drive would sound any better. When I got the custom shop script Phase 90 it sounded loads better, lovely smooth lush phasing and not harsh at all. I did find it a bit overpowering for my purposes though so sold it on and now I have the custom shop script Phase 45 and it's great - I drilled a whole in the side though so I could power using a power supply as I kept leaving it on with a battery in and it was pissing me off.
User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
.
.
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:19 am

Post by UlricvonCatalyst »

Boss PH-1 or PH-1R if you can find one. These almost never get mentioned when people recommend phasers, but they're both nice, thick-sounding funk machines. Having said that, a vintage Small Stone beats either if you can live with the huge enclosure.

At the cheaper end of the spectrum a Coron Phaser 50 makes a decent alternative to a Phase 90 and can usually be had for cheap when they come up on eBay.
User avatar
vierphoria
.
.
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:25 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by vierphoria »

Why not go for a Boss phaser?

I have the PH-3 and it does it thing (which, unfortnunately, wasn't my thing at all). It has an arpeggio-sounding mode called "Step" which is kinda novel, and it has a bunch of other modes (sweep up and down, etc.), as well as tap tempo and quite interactive knobs.

The reason as to why I hate it is simply because there is no subtlety to it. It phases the shit out of everything and when i stomp it my guitar turns into a malfunctioning space ship. If it would have had a blend knob on the other hand... Maybe...

I'm actually thinking of putting it in a feedback loop I'm about to build, but otherwise it's just laying in front of my amp, mocking me.