Japanese Jaguar hardware upgrades

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Japanese Jaguar hardware upgrades

Post by othomas2 »

So I really love my Japanese jag, and over the years modified a lot and experimented with different setups / pickups etc etc....

I've been thinking if I can improve it even further and have considered fitting some Gotoh vintage style machineheads and an avri Tremolo.

Worthy upgrades in relation to cost ?
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

The tuners are not that expensive...i would go for Klusons....
[quote="Doog"]Another of life's great mysteries solved.

Next week: where does my room go when I turn off the lights?
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

I was really impressed with cobain jag tuners.... obviously I wouldn't fit the same type, but hoping the same quality can be said for the others within this brand.

I fitted some white tipped Klusons previously and didn't think much of them at all, and put the originals back on. They seemed more substantial & effective to me.
User avatar
rps-10
.
.
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:41 pm
Location: S.E. WALES
Contact:

Post by rps-10 »

Genuine Gotoh tuners I've used have always been excellent, however copies of have been terrible.
How vintage is vintage in your eyes? As there are plenty of parted out Ibanez on ebay which all had quality Gotoh tuners back in the day.. 20 years ago in the 80's. Probably cheaper to buy a set of those than buy something new marketed as "Vintage" ?
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

The tuners that are on there will be identical internally to any repro Gotohs you buy unless you spend a fortune on TonePros ones. It will also make precisely zero difference (almost all tuning problems people blame on tuners are in fact down to the nut). Replacing the trem assembly is a far more worthwhile upgrade, although possibly a tricky one (Fender seem to be making it harder to get hold of AVRI trems).
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

I lube up the nut and bridge, and don't really have any issues with tuning.... I just feel there's a little too much in terms of tolerance when tuning them.

On a sperate note, the hole on the back of them... is this for greasing them up ? ...seems as though it could be something like that.... ie a service.


Do TonePros do something vintage that'd fit ?

thanks all.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

This all smacks of spending money for moneys sake unless there are actual quantifiable problems with the tuners and trem that are holding you back and/or annoying you right now.
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

... well, the trem is breaking a fair few strings... which is annoying when I use Elixirs. I filed / sanded down the holes which has improved but still not perfect. I know the avri ones have thicker chrome so that's the main reason behind that. Every time I bend a note I flinch cause I worry they'll snap lol.

I setup & service guitars on a regular basis & felt these factors would be a worthy upgrade, in relation to the small issues I'm facing. I play it up to about an hour a day...

If I wanted to spend money I'd be opting for an avri which I have no interest in doing.
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

Yep, the hole on the back of the tuners is for grease; pack some in and it'll take a lot of the excess play out. But I reiterate: upgrade the trem, not the tuners.
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

Thanks Benecol.... I will give that a whirl !!

Might give Fender a call tomorrow and suss out what might be going on with the trems
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

Which bridge are you using? I don't think the trem would be eating strings, might be the bridge.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

honeyiscool wrote:Which bridge are you using? I don't think the trem would be eating strings, might be the bridge.
It's definitely the trem... as that's where they're breaking, and it's not unwinding itself either.

The bridge is a tunomatic.... no issues there.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

othomas2 wrote:It's definitely the trem... as that's where they're breaking, and it's not unwinding itself either.
Sharp edges on the tail piece holes, i've had it before. Take the edges off with a fine needle file.
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

I've done that once already... and all was fine for several months, only recently has it started to occur again. Might try again....

I have been slackening and tightening the strings a lot whilst doing various operations on the guitar, so I'm sure that hasn't helped and eaten up the string a little, causing them to snap prematurely.
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

Sounds like you know the answer, then! New tailpiece day coming soon.

Also, which Tune-O-Matic did you install and how did that go?
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

Cheers... I don't remember, I had it kicking around from the jagstang days. It cost £30-40 at the time so it's decent & chunky. Perhaps a Gibson ? It's secured but could do with being permanently installed at some point. The cups of the tunomatic are currently wedged with match sticks to keep them vertical for example. But as for results it seems to give more sustain and focus than the mustang bridge which seems a little slug-ish and dead sounding to me now. I was quite surprised. I've tried things like the buzzstop to achieve similar ideals but have always been left disappointed.

You really here the effect they have when playing the adjustomatic Fenders.
benecol wrote:Yep, the hole on the back of the tuners is for grease; pack some in and it'll take a lot of the excess play out. But I reiterate: upgrade the trem, not the tuners.
I went the pharmacy and bought a baby feeding syringe and grabbed the Lithium grease from the garage and got to work... So far so good... nice amount or resistance now... & they seem more solid. cheers.
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

No worries, happy to be of service. Also, be interested to hear what Fender say about those trems; might well be an internet rumour that's gathered pace.
User avatar
othomas2
.
.
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: London

Post by othomas2 »

Yeah, I'll give them a call for sure. Will leave a note on my hand, always remember then !!!
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

honeyiscool wrote:New tailpiece day coming soon.
It gets worse. As if the endless tirade of 'NGD' wasn't enough.
Shabba.
User avatar
jim93
.
.
Posts: 2098
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:52 am

Post by jim93 »

I read in Offset that the cheap hardware weighs down your body affecting your tone. :P :roll: