a 'conversion' neck means that the neck is typically shorter to work with standard bridge/neck pocket placement in order to change the overall scale of the guitar. (i.e. when jagmasters went to 24", but didn't use a jaguar neck length, like the vistas, they used a conversion neck. which is why you can put one on a 25.5" scale tele/strat, and get a 24" scale guitar.)
sx necks are not really 'conversion' necks, but are actually just different length necks compared to fender's of the same scale length, from what i've gathered.
edited.
My Mustang project
Moderated By: mods
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
OK I'm on the same page as you. Thanks for clarifying.hotrodperlmutter wrote:a 'conversion' neck means that the neck is typically shorter to work with standard bridge/neck pocket placement in order to change the overall scale of the guitar. (i.e. when jagmasters went to 24", but didn't use a jaguar neck length, like the vistas, they used a conversion neck. which is why you can put one on a 25.5" scale tele/strat, and get a 24" scale guitar.)
sx necks are not really 'conversion' necks, but are actually just different length necks compared to fender's of the same scale length, from what i've gathered.
edited.
- SKC Willie
- Bunk Ass Fuck
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
- Location: Columbia, MO
- Contact:
Well, I was just referring to the size of the SX necks. They use a deeper neck pocket than a standard fender. You can use fender necks but they will need a shim. As far as getting the thing to intonate, I think a standard scale neck will work, so a conversion neck should work but there may not be enough movement in the saddles to interchange standard scale to short scale even w/ a conversion neck.
twitter.com/skcwillie
follow me . . . . you won't
follow me . . . . you won't
- honeyiscool
- .
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
- Location: San Diego, California