Page 6 of 8
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:05 pm
by matt.dines
i said they look like shite i didnt comment on the way they played!
i thought this was about ugly guitars!hahaha
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:08 pm
by endsjustifymeans
matt.dines wrote:i said they look like shite i didnt comment on the way they played!
i thought this was about ugly guitars!hahaha
Ah... but more than a few of them look great. You'll find a few of us have an off center view of what is visually appealing around here.
You were definitely wrong though, many daisy rocks were awesome looking guitars.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:09 pm
by laterallateral
Has Daisy-Rock gone under?
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:11 pm
by endsjustifymeans
laterallateral wrote:Has Daisy-Rock gone under?
I have no idea... I'm not sure why we started referring to them in the past tense.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:17 pm
by laterallateral
their website is alive and stinking of emo web design circa 2005.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:18 pm
by laterallateral
Look at the bangles sig model and TELL me that's ugly, noob.
Tell me.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:23 pm
by laterallateral
I saw that fail.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:23 pm
by endsjustifymeans
Almost as sexy as susanna hoffs eyes.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:24 pm
by endsjustifymeans
laterallateral wrote:I saw that fail.
You failed first big boy.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:25 pm
by matt.dines
hahaha
dont think much of the inlays and pickguards
but that looks alreet to be honest
you cant say the flower and the heart ones dont make you want to puke!
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:26 pm
by endsjustifymeans
matt.dines wrote:hahaha
dont think much of the inlays and pickguards
but that looks alreet to be honest
you cant say the flower and the heart ones dont make you want to puke!
yes, those ones are awful. But the ones shaped like guitars are class.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:28 pm
by laterallateral
so I win at failing?
That's not so bad. I can handle that.
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:24 am
by astro
I don't know if Daisy Rock's target demograph actually know who the bangles are...
They have quite a few nice looking designs. What's the quality like on their instruments?
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:49 am
by endsjustifymeans
astro wrote:I don't know if Daisy Rock's target demograph actually know who the bangles are...
They have quite a few nice looking designs. What's the quality like on their instruments?
believe it or not...
Excellent!
Both fit and finish and playabity. I still want to get my hands on a retro at some point.
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:09 am
by cur
I want to play this one a night when no one is looking.
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:15 am
by cur
As to the subject at hand, FUGLY and expensive. Will tribal ever go out of style?
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:18 am
by laterallateral
[/quote]
I CHOOSE CHAINSAW
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:37 am
by astro
endsjustifymeans wrote:astro wrote:I don't know if Daisy Rock's target demograph actually know who the bangles are...
They have quite a few nice looking designs. What's the quality like on their instruments?
believe it or not...
Excellent!
Both fit and finish and playabity. I still want to get my hands on a retro at some point.
That sounds cool, because they have a nice little cheap LP junior knockoff that's caught my eye...
How are the electronics and pickups? Good, or in need of a swap?
edit: just noticed that this one has a Duncan Designed pickup...
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:44 am
by endsjustifymeans
The retro I played was better than squier hardware. Didn't get under teh hood, but pots had good taper and no scratchiness. Pickup were strong and warm if a little middy and tuners were adequate.
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:49 am
by cur
laterallateral wrote:
I CHOOSE CHAINSAW[/quote]
Inspired by an zebra's asshole.