Page 6 of 14

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 3:32 am
by BoringPostcards
Narco Martenot wrote:What is the date of that photo? 1993-04-09? The knobs appear to be different in the photo?
Not sure. Got it from a thread in the mods + projects section of OSG.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:51 pm
by dkoor
That model looks good but I dislike the logo, I generally prefer 70s style Fender logos 8) .
Anyone knows what's the story behind it? I believe stock Jaguars never had this Kurt's logo?

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:32 pm
by stewart
it's probably because fender stick that damn logo on everything now as they obviously think it's more authentic, and probably so people don't start selling these guitars as vintage jags. there's always differences on their reissues.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:03 pm
by Narco Martenot
It's the same logo that was on his guitar, except "Jaguar" is too far away from "Fender".

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:45 pm
by stewart
His guitar had the spaghetti logo? I've never noticed.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:49 pm
by BoringPostcards
yea it did. It's really strange. I'm thinking it must have been a custom neck, because I've never seen a strat headstock, nor a spaghetti logo on a jaguar.

Image

here's a comparison pic of Kurt's jag with a 'normal' jag.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:34 pm
by dkoor
Bet KC sig will be a nice Jag but this spaghetti logo is kinda drawback to me... :?

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:17 pm
by rlm2112
ghey.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:49 pm
by Nick
Noirie. wrote: The neck pickup on Kurt's actual one was positioned a tad closer to the end of the neck.
My mistake, I thought you were talking about the Ferrington that the thread got derailed over a few pages back.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:24 pm
by stewart
ZenJenga wrote:yea it did. It's really strange. I'm thinking it must have been a custom neck, because I've never seen a strat headstock, nor a spaghetti logo on a jaguar.
► Show Spoiler


blimey, that does seem to make it one of a kind. bizarre.

edit: mind you, pat seems to unearth the occasional 60s weirdo mexican fender guitar which has the 50s logo on it, as if they thought "ah, this one's getting shipped across the border, fuck it."

perhaps it's a mexican export re-imported?

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:06 am
by Narco Martenot
Any photos of the Mexican guitars? Sounds interesting.

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:09 am
by stewart

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:20 am
by Sven
This is my theory.

The guitar had a standard jag neck w/ standard decal. The headstock sustained some chunky damage so the bottom portion was re-shaped to get rid of the damaged area and subsequently made the overall shape look more strat-like. The standard jag decal was removed in the process so they threw a repro decal on headstock and called it a day.

I have actually seen that repro spaghetti jag decal on one other guitar (a righty jaguar).

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 4:16 am
by SKC Willie
the two guitars in the pictures are also different years . . .


Kurt's had blocks and binding, the other has no biding, so it's older.

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 4:26 am
by hotrodperlmutter
kurts guitar did not have blocks, but the fact remains that they never used strat headstocks or spaghetti logos on any year of jaguar.

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:29 am
by SKC Willie
well piss, I just meant binding . . .


and are we really sure what they did on left models? I mean, the strat headstock, sure; they're not going to change that. But it wouldn't surprise me if they used those logos. Also, I don't see why if there was a mishap with the headstock, Kurt would want the logo put back on. Doesn't really seem to his personality, right?

I also realize I'm saying that I've never actually met him but it's not how I would perceive his personality.

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:22 am
by Thomas
I was in my local guitar emporium yesterday and they said they have 2 of these coming in soon. I'll check it out just to see what it's like. They also said it was the.more limited relic one they were getting in so they must be doing 2 versions.

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:07 am
by rlm2112
Sven wrote:This is my theory.

The guitar had a standard jag neck w/ standard decal. The headstock sustained some chunky damage so the bottom portion was re-shaped to get rid of the damaged area and subsequently made the overall shape look more strat-like. The standard jag decal was removed in the process so they threw a repro decal on headstock and called it a day.

I have actually seen that repro spaghetti jag decal on one other guitar (a righty jaguar).
Good theory!
portugalwillie wrote:well piss, I just meant binding . . .


and are we really sure what they did on left models? I mean, the strat headstock, sure; they're not going to change that. But it wouldn't surprise me if they used those logos. Also, I don't see why if there was a mishap with the headstock, Kurt would want the logo put back on. Doesn't really seem to his personality, right?

I also realize I'm saying that I've never actually met him but it's not how I would perceive his personality.
You're probably assuming correctly, therefore it would have happened before he owned it.

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:57 am
by othomas2
Clearest photo of Kurts Jag yet, be it only a portion of it....

Image


Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:50 am
by dkoor
This seems ok but why are strings put backwards :shock: .
I mean it's ok for lefties but for common right handed guitarist this ain't gonna work.

Maybe they gonna make lefty KC jag for right handed guitarists and "normal" Jag for lefties... so they can flip it backwards Hendrix stlye :lol: