Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:49 pm
CROSS_guitars wrote:
CROSS_guitars wrote:
Thought about that. Possibly.Chris Fleming wrote:Not got a major problem with them, and when it's as neat as that even less so. Would be nice if you had a matching wooden cover plate for it, sprayed the same as the body?
CROSS_guitars wrote:Ok. I'm getting some more progress done with this neck.
I replaced the white dots with nicer slighter bigger pearl dots.
CROSS_guitars wrote:
MatthewK wrote:That's a fuller neck profile than I am used to.
CROSS_guitars wrote:I made it a bit deeper.
this is about as much as I'm comfortable taking off it.
It's pretty damn neat, if I say so myself.
the original has more of a concave. But it's nearly impossible for me to recreate that completely.
Mine is done a lot more like the Bilt heads.
CROSS_guitars wrote:I've also done most of the shaping of the back of the neck.
I used a spoke shave and electric sanders.
Punkacc9 wants a 'V' profile. But it turned out to be more of a standard thin neck.
It's alright. He's new to building necks and this is his first starcaster neck. And I think it is coming out awesomely. He is also wayyyyy cheaper than the other people I asked to build a starcaster neck. I told him a v profile or a thin profile. So either or doesn't matter. As for the swoop. That doesn't bother me. If I really want it more concave ill have cooterfinger do it. This is the same way as built and stereordinary does it.Thomas wrote:So he didn't do the headstock right OR do the neck carve you asked for.... Well worth the money then.