Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:19 pm
4 to 5 years is how long I've been playing guitar, but I know how hard it is to find any thing left handed.
wow. unconditional hate.paul_ wrote:Do not like the hand vibrato, whether it works fine or not. Otherwise 2 thumbs up. Will check 'em out if I see one.
thanks, never got why it was called tremolo, since it doesn't do what tremolo is suppose to..DanHeron wrote:Both words are used to describe it. Technically its a vibrato arm, vibrato changes pitch - tremolo changes volume. But some time "Leo Fender patented a unit for the Stratocaster called the synchronized tremolo and we've called it that ever since"sp3k wrote:vibrato?! isn't it called tremolo? or they are two different things, vibrato bar and tremolo bar?paul_ wrote:Do not like the hand vibrato, whether it works fine or not. Otherwise 2 thumbs up. Will check 'em out if I see one.
i like this kind of vibrato, sometimes. i prefer vibratoes that arent able to dive bomb, because dive bombing is for wanks and the best thing you can do with a vibrato is the patented kevin shields "shimmer" anyway.Diva wrote:I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.
This is hurb on divas account by the way.
No we are talking even more limited than that. and REALLLY STIFF.william wrote:i like this kind of vibrato, sometimes. i prefer vibratoes that arent able to dive bomb, because dive bombing is for wanks and the best thing you can do with a vibrato is the patented kevin shields "shimmer" anyway.Diva wrote:I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.
This is hurb on divas account by the way.
Diva wrote:No we are talking even more limited than that. and REALLLY STIFF.william wrote:i like this kind of vibrato, sometimes. i prefer vibratoes that arent able to dive bomb, because dive bombing is for wanks and the best thing you can do with a vibrato is the patented kevin shields "shimmer" anyway.Diva wrote:I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.
This is hurb on divas account by the way.
I am not a whammy guy I like my mustang and jaguar style trems. this was bad.
There's also a yellow one right?Diva wrote:![]()
Was it weaker than say a bigsby? I would probably still enjoy it as even if it just is the equivalent of pushing in the neck/body to get that slight surfy sound, I would feel like I could get the same thing without putting a lot of stress on the neck pocket.Diva wrote:Yeah I was disappointed. I may still get one as they looked hot. and work something out with a new tremolo. I took a pic on my phone I will try and upload it.
that reminds me more of antiguasilly_rabbit_band wrote:The weird burst one in the middle?
Reminds of one of those horse shoe crabs.
Imagine the long horn in ANTIGUA.the_dude wrote:that reminds me more of antiguasilly_rabbit_band wrote:The weird burst one in the middle?
Reminds of one of those horse shoe crabs.