Page 7 of 8

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:19 pm
by Ty
4 to 5 years is how long I've been playing guitar, but I know how hard it is to find any thing left handed.

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:27 pm
by william
paul_ wrote:Do not like the hand vibrato, whether it works fine or not. Otherwise 2 thumbs up. Will check 'em out if I see one.
wow. unconditional hate. :lol:

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:32 pm
by sp3k
DanHeron wrote:
sp3k wrote:
paul_ wrote:Do not like the hand vibrato, whether it works fine or not. Otherwise 2 thumbs up. Will check 'em out if I see one.
vibrato?! isn't it called tremolo? or they are two different things, vibrato bar and tremolo bar?
Both words are used to describe it. Technically its a vibrato arm, vibrato changes pitch - tremolo changes volume. But some time "Leo Fender patented a unit for the Stratocaster called the synchronized tremolo and we've called it that ever since"
thanks, never got why it was called tremolo, since it doesn't do what tremolo is suppose to..

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:38 pm
by Will
A few sites say they'll sell for $350. I'm going down to my dealer in the next few days to do a down payment.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:42 am
by Diva
I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.


This is hurb on divas account by the way.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:48 am
by william
Diva wrote:I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.


This is hurb on divas account by the way.
i like this kind of vibrato, sometimes. i prefer vibratoes that arent able to dive bomb, because dive bombing is for wanks and the best thing you can do with a vibrato is the patented kevin shields "shimmer" anyway.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:51 am
by Diva
william wrote:
Diva wrote:I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.


This is hurb on divas account by the way.
i like this kind of vibrato, sometimes. i prefer vibratoes that arent able to dive bomb, because dive bombing is for wanks and the best thing you can do with a vibrato is the patented kevin shields "shimmer" anyway.
No we are talking even more limited than that. and REALLLY STIFF.
I am not a whammy guy I like my mustang and jaguar style trems. this was bad.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:51 am
by william
Diva wrote:
william wrote:
Diva wrote:I very briefly played one of these at namm. they looked amazing. the one thing I can say is the tremolo sucked balls. it was really stiff and had no travel at all. shame really. but they do look really cool and well made/ didnt get to hear em as it was after hours when I tried em.


This is hurb on divas account by the way.
i like this kind of vibrato, sometimes. i prefer vibratoes that arent able to dive bomb, because dive bombing is for wanks and the best thing you can do with a vibrato is the patented kevin shields "shimmer" anyway.
No we are talking even more limited than that. and REALLLY STIFF.
I am not a whammy guy I like my mustang and jaguar style trems. this was bad.
:( weak.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:11 am
by Diva
Yeah I was disappointed. I may still get one as they looked hot. and work something out with a new tremolo. I took a pic on my phone I will try and upload it.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:20 am
by Diva
Image


Image

I took these ultra twin.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:50 am
by Ty
DAMN THOSE GUITARS ARE HOTT! I THINK I KNOW WHAT MY NEXT BIG PURCHASE WILL BE!

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:52 am
by BobArsecake
I just don't get the Longhorn :s People rave about them but I think it's one of, it not the ugliest guitar design ever.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:56 am
by Ty
The weird burst one in the middle?
Reminds of one of those horse shoe crabs.
Image

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:59 am
by sp3k
Diva wrote: Image
There's also a yellow one right?

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:09 am
by william
update: i hate these new danoes.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:55 am
by Nick
Diva wrote:Yeah I was disappointed. I may still get one as they looked hot. and work something out with a new tremolo. I took a pic on my phone I will try and upload it.
Was it weaker than say a bigsby? I would probably still enjoy it as even if it just is the equivalent of pushing in the neck/body to get that slight surfy sound, I would feel like I could get the same thing without putting a lot of stress on the neck pocket.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:59 am
by Will
I'm sure that's just a setup issue. With some heavier strings and tweaking the tension a bit, I'm sure you can get it to float.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:08 am
by Josh
silly_rabbit_band wrote:The weird burst one in the middle?
Reminds of one of those horse shoe crabs.
Image
that reminds me more of antigua

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:13 am
by Ty
the_dude wrote:
silly_rabbit_band wrote:The weird burst one in the middle?
Reminds of one of those horse shoe crabs.
Image
that reminds me more of antigua
Imagine the long horn in ANTIGUA.

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:14 am
by Nick