Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:16 pm
Yeah..just been used on most rock albums at some point. Hardly microphones at all, yeah.Sloan wrote:fuck sm57s they're not even microphones.
Yeah..just been used on most rock albums at some point. Hardly microphones at all, yeah.Sloan wrote:fuck sm57s they're not even microphones.
i use em, but i try not to.Doog wrote:Yeah..just been used on most rock albums at some point. Hardly microphones at all, yeah.Sloan wrote:fuck sm57s they're not even microphones.
Mike. I love you. you are a great guy, but dude! YOu play JVM and then tell someone to get the CRATE version of mixers??? WTF?Mike wrote:The Behringer will be considerably better,.
Yeah, Behringer pretty much makes the very bottom of the barrel in the music business today. I've used their littlest eurorack mixer, and it is definitely teh sux0rs. teh EQ is liek sooo not 1337.More Cowbell wrote:Mike. I love you. you are a great guy, but dude! YOu play JVM and then tell someone to get the CRATE version of mixers??? WTF?Mike wrote:The Behringer will be considerably better,.
What's wrong with Crate?More Cowbell wrote:Mike. I love you. you are a great guy, but dude! YOu play JVM and then tell someone to get the CRATE version of mixers??? WTF?Mike wrote:The Behringer will be considerably better,.
Check out the Sennheiser e609, I really love this mic. It's a little bright, but it works great. I never want to use another mic on my amp for a gig EVER. It's completely really sweet for clean sonds too.euan wrote:Recommend me something then Sloan
That statement is said so often it's like an urban legend or something. It's not very accurate, but hardly worth arguing against.fretman wrote:Used SM57 ftw. It's often the best choice at any price. There's a reason that studios with 10 zillion dollar mic cabinets regularly use $90 57's on guitar cabs (and snare drums) - they work. Lots of other mics work great as well, but not many at the posted "sub SM57 price" point...
I realize you said it's not worth arguing about, but I'm making that statement as much from experience as "legend". What's not accurate about it?bob wrote:That statement is said so often it's like an urban legend or something. It's not very accurate, but hardly worth arguing against.fretman wrote:Used SM57 ftw. It's often the best choice at any price. There's a reason that studios with 10 zillion dollar mic cabinets regularly use $90 57's on guitar cabs (and snare drums) - they work. Lots of other mics work great as well, but not many at the posted "sub SM57 price" point...
I agree, in sentiment, but I think alot of credible engineers and producers do think it's the best mic for some things (namely guitar cabs and snare drums). World class studios use 57's all the time, but world class restaurants don't serve microwave meals (hopefully)! In any case, at $90 new, it's a good value, and a used one would fit the bill of the original post (imho, ymmv, and all that)!bob wrote:It's like a decent quality microwave meal. It's very easy to get it to do what you want it, and it does sort of work for it's purpose. It's always going to be a bit shit though, and you may as well do the job properly if you're going to bother.
I don't absolutely hate them, but I wouldn't want to use one if I had an option. I've never found a situation where it was the best mic for the job. It's just that it pretty much sounds ok on everything, so it's quick, easy and you don't have to think about it.
Sloan wrote:I can't speak for anything else you mentioned, but I also have 2 old Unidyne mics, and they are fantastic for acoustic & vocals. However, and you might disagree Sloan, despite my best placement efforts I can't get it to sound that great in front of a cab.euan wrote:
If your still stuck on an SM57, check out some of it's predecessors (Shure Unidyne series) on ebay, I got one for $12. It's a little darker character than the sm57.