Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:51 am
bubbles_horwitz wrote:eww. transparent colored bursts over flamey mapple are for old people and prs fans (which are usually old people).
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:08 am
pure sex.deadonkey wrote:bubbles_horwitz wrote:eww. transparent colored bursts over flamey mapple are for old people and prs fans (which are usually old people).
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:47 pm
i meant colors like green, blue, purple, etc. they're just wrong.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:13 pm
No way jose. That blue is teh sexy.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:29 pm
OLDdeadonkey wrote:bubbles_horwitz wrote:eww. transparent colored bursts over flamey mapple are for old people and prs fans (which are usually old people).
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:51 pm
christ. robert plant looks like a sheep dog.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:33 pm
I thought that was Sammy Hagar.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:36 pm
he kinda looks like dee snider too
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:19 pm
He also looks like at least 3 of these guys...
Re: If Only all Gibson Les Pauls looked this awesome
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:50 pm
Holy crap! There's a Gibson that looks just like this one at a pawn shop by my house. The color is amazing like a Robin's Egg blue. Unfortunately, it's going for friggin $3000.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
I really don't like Les Pauls, but I quite like that 'un.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:09 pm
i had that guitar. it was amazing. i loved that blue too. i broke it when my band played with he is legend and acceptance. boo.Justin wrote:What's so special about that?
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:01 am
Buying a Les Paul is about as original as wearing a turtleneck in 1993.
Cool colour though. (ya, I said colOUR..that's how us Canadians spell it.)
Cool colour though. (ya, I said colOUR..that's how us Canadians spell it.)
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:06 pm
Yep, and you got it from something called "the english language." Well done.soma89 wrote:Cool colour though. (ya, I said colOUR..that's how us Canadians spell it.)
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:39 pm
back to the prs bit.
thats crap
a couple grand for a guitar that DOES NOT intonate.
that "general" bridge is crap,
if they are going to making guitars that are high quility and command a high dollar then they need to use a bridge that is actually WORTH using.
i know, i always gripe about this.
thats crap
a couple grand for a guitar that DOES NOT intonate.
that "general" bridge is crap,
if they are going to making guitars that are high quility and command a high dollar then they need to use a bridge that is actually WORTH using.
i know, i always gripe about this.
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:45 am
It's particularly bad because PRS are set up for 9's if I'm not mistaken, and scale length is only 25".
put 10's on it like it needs and you're sure to throw it off.
Which is why if I ever had to get a PRS, it'd have to be one with a trem.
put 10's on it like it needs and you're sure to throw it off.
Which is why if I ever had to get a PRS, it'd have to be one with a trem.
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:26 am
the only les paul i would even consider buying
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:55 pm
dazed&abused wrote:the only les paul i would even consider buying
I SECOND THAT. (In Tv Yellow
)Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:01 pm
The yellow and black thing is a bit too tele for me, red on the other hand means i wouldn't buy an SG later on, which is surely a good thing. Spend the dollar on a tele deluxe/firebird/flying v instead.