Page 2 of 9
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:35 pm
by rodvonbon
Mike wrote:
Holy fucking shit. If it didn't have that ugly (upside down) humbucker in it, this guitar would be so perfect.
I know it doesn't make it any easier for you, but upside down is the only was they fit.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:38 pm
by Reece
A quick bit of photoshopping would indicate:
I defaintely like 2 best out of all of them.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:40 pm
by rodvonbon
Haha, I did the same thing, but didn't think the results showed the differences fairly so I wasn't gonna post it.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:41 pm
by Reece
Yeah, especially 3, it looks more orange in the photos than it does there.
I still like 2 best though.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:42 pm
by rodvonbon
IRL 3 is almost dayglow.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:43 pm
by Mike
rodvonbon wrote:Mike wrote:
Holy fucking shit. If it didn't have that ugly (upside down) humbucker in it, this guitar would be so perfect.
I know it doesn't make it any easier for you, but upside down is the only was they fit.
I'm a snob, but it's singles all the way for me to be honest.
Whatever gets your rocks off, but aren't you getting all the response that should be on the bass strings on the trebs and vice versa?
I guess it must sound good to you.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:47 pm
by Pacafeliz
dammit after that my pants don't fit me no more!!!
i'd literally screw guitar #2. she's end up looking like #3 after lotsa prision sex. sorry i can't behave.
i'm too turned on by this.
i'll be in the bathroom now...
thanks for that!
Pat.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:49 pm
by rodvonbon
Mike wrote:rodvonbon wrote:Mike wrote:
Holy fucking shit. If it didn't have that ugly (upside down) humbucker in it, this guitar would be so perfect.
I know it doesn't make it any easier for you, but upside down is the only was they fit.
I'm a snob, but it's singles all the way for me to be honest.
Whatever gets your rocks off, but aren't you getting all the response that should be on the bass strings on the trebs and vice versa?
I guess it must sound good to you.
Different strokes and all that.
No poles mean that the rail is almost dead even all the way across. No one string jumps out more than any other. I do have it pitched towards the treble strings though.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:50 pm
by James
I realise the price jump is fairly big, but I'd be happy to pay the extra for a guitar that looked as good as these. A lot of picking between guitars is aesthetic anyway, and it isn't like the value of them is going to tank anytime soon so it's very low risk.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:52 pm
by rodvonbon
Here is an old picture that kind of shows the funky patina on the neck of guitar 3
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:54 pm
by James
How does the neck feel? Is it that vintage worn thing where it seems to just play itself?
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:00 pm
by rodvonbon
James wrote:I realise the price jump is fairly big, but I'd be happy to pay the extra for a guitar that looked as good as these. A lot of picking between guitars is aesthetic anyway, and it isn't like the value of them is going to tank anytime soon so it's very low risk.
So true, but if you look at it as an investment you might not be as comfortable playing them live though. Having to baby a guitar because your concerned about it's value might take away from the enjoyment. I play the hell out of all of them and when they get bumped or beer sprayed all over I don't get too worried. The way I see it is I have invested in my own satisfaction and not the price tag on the guitar.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:02 pm
by rodvonbon
James wrote:How does the neck feel? Is it that vintage worn thing where it seems to just play itself?
Oh it's nice. I prefer this one to the others honsetly. It doesn't have the looks factor, but is nice and easy.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:02 pm
by serfx
rodvonbon wrote:James wrote:I realise the price jump is fairly big, but I'd be happy to pay the extra for a guitar that looked as good as these. A lot of picking between guitars is aesthetic anyway, and it isn't like the value of them is going to tank anytime soon so it's very low risk.
So true, but if you look at it as an investment you might not be as comfortable playing them live though. Having to baby a guitar because your concerned about it's value might take away from the enjoyment. I play the hell out of all of them and when they get bumped or beer sprayed all over I don't get too worried. The way I see it is I have invested in my own satisfaction and not the price tag on the guitar.
the way i've always looked at playing a guitar is treating it as though it owes me money.. so they have a tendency to get knocked about a bit, but enjoyed more then anything else.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:13 pm
by Sven
Rodvonbon,
Your guitars are very nice and I also must compliment you on your new line of toys.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:17 pm
by rodvonbon
Sven wrote:Rodvonbon,
Your guitars are very nice and I also must compliment you on your new line of toys.
Hey Mark, I should give you credit for finding the first guitar and graciously selling it to me
I have thought about buying that goofy toy, since I did by all of the other 1/8 scale Mustang models.
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:37 pm
by freekandy
if you ever ever sell number 1 mustang, please contact me. i would be forever in debt to you
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:41 pm
by Sven
rodvonbon wrote:
Hey Mark, I should give you credit for finding the first guitar and graciously selling it to me
I have thought about buying that goofy toy, since I did by all of the other 1/8 scale Mustang models.
I miss that guitar...but am glad it's getting played and is in good hands.
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:15 am
by DGNR8
OMG I like all of them. I am so torn. If you ever thin the herd, DON'T.
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:24 am
by James
I need to start requesting more threads.