Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:07 am
by mewithoutus
hey, everyone off the "be a dick to mewman" wagon. its shitty. im actually trying to be constructive here. didnt mean to get sand in your very sensitive vag.

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:34 am
by Mike
mewithoutus wrote:hey, everyone off the "be a dick to mewman" wagon. its shitty. im actually trying to be constructive here. didnt mean to get sand in your very sensitive vag.

With that whiny post it seems you're the sensitive one.

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:57 am
by mewithoutus
no.


you told me to lay off him, as if i was being unnecessarily rough with him or something.

you are so frustrating.

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:00 am
by jamieb
Hmm huh eh? I've missed all the excitement it seems!
mewithoutus wrote:no need to be snarky. maybe its not for you and thats fine. i just think a more objective review would be more useful
The whole post was my experience with the AC-15, dude, by nature that makes it pretty subjective. When I first got the thing, I turned the tremolol on and kept on winding til something interesting happened; it didn't, I got bored and the footswitch got booted into a cupboard. 'The tremolo is shit' seemed a pretty reasonable conclusion to me. If you're complaining that I didn't review any of the tremolol's 'usable' features; well that's because there aren't any. Alright, it throbs a bit, well done. You can't just replace "severely limited" with "vintage" and hope everyone will think it's a feature. Well, unless you're Fender.

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:19 am
by mewithoutus
i didnt replace anything with vintage. i said it was vintage sounding.

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:03 pm
by Skip
the ac 15 won't carry you live-----
close but you need more,bro