Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:37 am
by filtercap
Haze wrote: Image
What's that white stuff around the pedal?


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:43 am
by Haze
glow n the dark sticker
comes in handy in live shows i'd imagine. Mine's on all the time though :lol:

OH FUCKS WHAT IS THAT!

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:46 am
by Reece
i've no idea how no-ones noticed it but what's that white stuff around the pedal?

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:49 am
by Haze
..........




anyways, being productive
the Mr Springgy goes for about $200 new
Holy Grail would be a cheaper 1 trick pony

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:51 am
by Reece
hehehe i don't think i could revive that shortscale meme myself.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:56 am
by Haze
Haze wrote:glow n the dark sticker
comes in handy in live shows i'd imagine. Mine's on all the time though :lol:

OH FUCKS WHAT IS THAT!
fixed

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:59 am
by Reece
moving backwards. is the reverse on the hardwire 100% reverb or more like 50/50 clean/verb?

my rf-1 is 50/50 and it could really do with a mix control or for it to just be 100% all the time on that mode.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:01 am
by Haze
100% wet

i actually hashed out a demo today :?
not so good, but here it goes

[youtube][/youtube]

got super tired of playing that line over and over

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:14 am
by Mages
I don't know about the hardwire but on the digiverb you can set it to any mix you like. so you can set it 100% wet if you like and then just run it through yr effects loop. or just play it 100% wet for MBV t0nes.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:18 am
by Reece
o rly? someone had a digiverb at doogfest and it seemed very similar to the RF-1. i make make a switch, i think i could probably profit from that too, i got my rf-1 for £40 and they retail for more so i shall check the bay and see how much they're going for.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:14 am
by Josh
Haze wrote:..........




anyways, being productive
the Mr Springgy goes for about $200 new
Holy Grail would be a cheaper 1 trick pony
Are you kidding? 200 dollars new for the equivilent of a holy grail?
With that plus about 50-60 dollars you could have a holiest grail.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:31 am
by ultratwin
the_dude wrote:
Haze wrote:..........




anyways, being productive
the Mr Springgy goes for about $200 new
Holy Grail would be a cheaper 1 trick pony
Are you kidding? 200 dollars new for the equivilent of a holy grail?
With that plus about 50-60 dollars you could have a holiest grail.

The Holiest Grail has so much going for it, and is a shoegazer's dream come true.

I personally have used the Holy Grail on and off for nearly six years and don't really like it, except for the Flerb function that I do make use of from time to time. My main gripe is due to the knob being a mix control of sorts that will have your dry signal (read: output volume) swallowed up as reverb increases, which in essence is quite unlike the natural response from a amp's springbox. As shown on the Mr. Springy demo, the addition of more 'verb doesn't kill your clean signal, and the corresponding response differs significantly from the Holy Grail. I doubt I'd ever get a Mr. Springy, but I like how it sounds.

My present verb is a neato little EBS box. Both plate and room settings are really sweet, and gives a wide palate of space to move about...Here's a bass demo with the Dynaverb on a room setting:



[youtube][/youtube]

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:06 pm
by william
goddamn, that holiest grail has some crazy assed long decay.

otherwise, the PGS demo sucks. he's like "i have the input gain set low with my les paul into a 65 amps soho for a clean sound" (okay, he didnt say the 65 amps part) but then everything sounds overdriven anyway. wtf.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:21 pm
by Josh
william wrote:goddamn, that holiest grail has some crazy assed long decay.

otherwise, the PGS demo sucks. he's like "i have the input gain set low with my les paul into a 65 amps soho for a clean sound" (okay, he didnt say the 65 amps part) but then everything sounds overdriven anyway. wtf.
I think mike said that humbuckers break up earlier than single coils once.

What I think is BS anyway is how they'll have the amp overdriven when your watching an overdrive pedal demo.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:30 pm
by william
the_dude wrote:
william wrote:goddamn, that holiest grail has some crazy assed long decay.

otherwise, the PGS demo sucks. he's like "i have the input gain set low with my les paul into a 65 amps soho for a clean sound" (okay, he didnt say the 65 amps part) but then everything sounds overdriven anyway. wtf.
I think mike said that humbuckers break up earlier than single coils once.

What I think is BS anyway is how they'll have the amp overdriven when your watching an overdrive pedal demo.
the pickups dont break up, but hums tend to push the amp harder... you can get a clean tone with humbuckers, for sure, and that wasn't it.

PGS has an awesome library of terrible demos. its sad.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:39 pm
by Josh
william wrote:
the_dude wrote:
william wrote:goddamn, that holiest grail has some crazy assed long decay.

otherwise, the PGS demo sucks. he's like "i have the input gain set low with my les paul into a 65 amps soho for a clean sound" (okay, he didnt say the 65 amps part) but then everything sounds overdriven anyway. wtf.
I think mike said that humbuckers break up earlier than single coils once.

What I think is BS anyway is how they'll have the amp overdriven when your watching an overdrive pedal demo.
the pickups dont break up, but hums tend to push the amp harder... you can get a clean tone with humbuckers, for sure, and that wasn't it.

PGS has an awesome library of terrible demos. its sad.
yeah. thats what i meant.

I don't watch PGS demos much so I wouldn't know how bad they are. All I hear is. "I'll be using a les paul... then im going to plug in a strat". then i shut it off.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:52 pm
by william
the_dude wrote: All I hear is. "I'll be using a les paul... then im going to plug in a strat". then i shut it off.
wise.


i watch them because they are sometimes the only one available, for certain effects. but they arent great.

a bit more consideration for the scientific process would do them wonders. they contaminate every specimen with that OD shit.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:55 pm
by James
william wrote:
the_dude wrote: All I hear is. "I'll be using a les paul... then im going to plug in a strat". then i shut it off.
wise.
Pretentious more like.

People know what strats and LPs sound like. For most people it's much more useful to hera a demo done with one of those, or a tele or whatever, than it is a jazzmaster.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:57 pm
by william
James wrote:
william wrote:
the_dude wrote: All I hear is. "I'll be using a les paul... then im going to plug in a strat". then i shut it off.
wise.
Pretentious more like.

People know what strats and LPs sound like. For most people it's much more useful to hera a demo done with one of those, or a tele or whatever, than it is a jazzmaster.

ahhh, i just realised that the dude was hating on strats/les pauls.

unwise.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:57 pm
by Reece
aye i don't mind pgs demos. they're not blues wanky, they're close mic'ed and they get right to the point. they always sing the praises of their pedals but that's understandable 'cause they're trying to sell em.

the overdriven thing annoys me but their demos of fuzzes, delays, reverbs and modulation pedals are usually decent. have you ever watched gearwire's very own dan augusto? after that you'll appreciate good demos much much more.

how he can make a tele into a marshall sound that horrible is beyond me.