can we get him to join shortscale and then quietly go round to his house for tea and theft?
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 9:59 pm
by NBarnes21
Progrockabuse wrote:mike made me a duo-fuzz, which is basically another name for a super fuzz but under the brand of shaftsbury. it'll will rip your knee caps off and take you for a meal with mr and mrs pain. violent quiche for one?
[youtube][/youtube]
Sounds great, I want one.
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 10:06 pm
by Chorlton
Mike wrote:Never, ever buy the Wattson. For you would be giving money to a chonst.
Without good cause, that is harsh.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 4:12 pm
by jcyphe
Why the fuck do any of these pedals have LEDs that's beyond pointless.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:32 pm
by Doog
jcyphe wrote:Why the fuck do any of these pedals have LEDs that's beyond pointless.
So you can tell it's on before launching into a song in a live situation?
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:33 pm
by Sloan
wut did mewithus do?
an sadded
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:36 pm
by mcconnachiea
jcyphe wrote:Why the fuck do any of these pedals have LEDs that's beyond pointless.
Whatever you've been smoking, I want some
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:49 pm
by Mike
Everyone knows how much having an LED affects the sound of a pedal, it's a real nightmare.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:26 pm
by blacktaxi
Actually LEDs affect your eyes, especially blue ones (LEDs that is), and what's more to say - LEDs contribute to lighting pollution. Now that's a real nightmare.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:08 pm
by aen
jcyphe wrote:Why the fuck do any of these pedals have LEDs that's beyond pointless.
Seriously, you would complain if they were hanging you with a new rope.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:24 pm
by jcyphe
well I just saw that Mike's is a modified circuit, but I was talking about the copies of the original version. The only thing I could see is if you were playing multiple fuzz pedals, but not many people do that, especially with a superfuzz. Whatever.
There is still no great Superfuzz copy. The Watson is probaly the closest production one I heard from clips and it's missing something, it's a good fuzz pedal but not as cool as the old ones and I told him taht before he started acting like a douche, when he posted clips.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:25 pm
by jcyphe
aen wrote:
jcyphe wrote:Why the fuck do any of these pedals have LEDs that's beyond pointless.
Seriously, you would complain if they were hanging you with a new rope.
I don't know what this means? Is this your latest tired aen quip.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:33 pm
by benecol
jcyphe wrote:There is still no great Superfuzz copy. The Watson is probaly the closest production one I heard from clips and it's missing something, it's a good fuzz pedal but not as cool as the old ones and I told him taht before he started acting like a douche, when he posted clips.
Hello. I've been after a Superfuzz for donkey's years, and eventually plumped for the BYOC Leeds. I was particularly interested to read what theampsurgeon (the other, decent, half of Wattson) had to say about it elsewhere)
theampsurgeon wrote:I haven't build a BYOC Leeds, but I've looked at the design. It's pretty much identical to the treadle type Univox SuperFuzz, including the NOS transistors. With a little care, I don't see any reason why it wouldn't sound identical to a Univox.
By the way, the Wattson is a hybrid between the early Shin-ei and later Univox pedals. A few of the components are different values, and we don't use NOS transistors. There's nothing really "magical" about the 2SC828. It was a rather common consumer grade silicon transistor. In fact, modern silicon transistor geometries are a little more stable. But, if you want a pedal that's 100% faithful to the Univox circuit design, then the BYOC looks like a great choice. BYOC PCB's are superb!
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 2:43 am
by Mages
Mike wrote:Everyone knows how much having an LED affects the sound of a pedal, it's a real nightmare.
lol
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 7:26 am
by Mike
I on the other hand, do use 2SC828s in my builds, and do my own design work (see other thread for layout).
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 7:47 am
by shae
Progrockabuse wrote:mike made me a duo-fuzz,
I read this and it goes to show what a good bloke Mike is. I post on various local forums and any/all of the builders on them only ever reply with "Buy my shit!". But again, Mike let his work and customer service do the talking. So you never feel pressured or sales gimmicks thrown your direction.
Kudos man.
I'd also recommend building your own or getting someone to put one together for you. At least that way you have (almost) unlimited variations/modifications available to you instantly... lately I've been thinking of a fuzz factory + sho build as it's bound to go first on my chain, and ultimately gives me two pedals in the same sized enclosure. That way I don't spend boat loads on a SHO/BoR and keep my pedal board to a minimum number of pedals.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 7:57 am
by Mike
I generally find that if you think "What would Aug do?" and do the opposite, that you can't go far wrong. I won't pimp my stuff out here, and generally I always have a chat with people when they're thinking of ordering, because sometimes the price I have to charge to cover parts, paints and labour means my pedals aren't as cheap as some of the competitors out there, for example Tremolo, if you're not interested in the fully featured trem I do, then I would say that the Danelectro Tunamelt/Cool Cat Trem are great recommendations.
I have no desire to flummox or pressure people into ordering pedals from me. I reckon if people can build that the BYOC would be a great project, apparently they're excellent. Sublimedo has made tons of them and is a big fan, and he's a superstar Electronic Engineer.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:34 am
by Bacchus
aen wrote:
jcyphe wrote:Why the fuck do any of these pedals have LEDs that's beyond pointless.
Seriously, you would complain if they were hanging you with a new rope.
Hahaha.
What happened to Mewwithoutus? I don't remember him actually doing anything wrong other than being a bit obnoxious. I remember he made a "I'm leaving now" thread, which was pretty gay.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:51 am
by Mike
He sort of imploded on his own ego. He talks a bigger game than he really actually knows. The other guy in the Wattson game is a great bloke with lots of tech knowledge, although I disagree with him on some fundamentals.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:34 pm
by jcyphe
Mike pretty much does the business/forum thing on the highest level you can. He doesn't postwhore about it, he lets others who have recieved his work talk it up, he's not doing a NOHO style "you guys are gonna be super amazed at our latest project thread".