Less so since he parted w/the music master.
It was weird ot line it up on the rack, and see 3 of the same bodies right next ot echother. Duosonic, Mustang bass adn musicmaster.
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:51 am
by Mike
I'm either a trend setter or a trend follower. Either way I love my Jag.
That's not to say I never loved my Telecasters, because I do, and did.
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:03 pm
by dots
Mike wrote:I'm either a trend setter or a trend follower.
clearly the former, sir. =]
Re: JAGUAR: the new telecaster
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:02 pm
by Chicago Mike
dots wrote:I APPROVE, although i still think teles are rad.
Yes Sir....love'em Fender Telecasters. Alghouth I want to put a humbucker in the neck of mine.
Re: JAGUAR: the new telecaster
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:52 pm
by Haze
Chicago Mike wrote:
dots wrote:I APPROVE, although i still think teles are rad.
Yes Sir....love'em Fender Telecasters. Alghouth I want to put a humbucker in the neck of mine.
likewise, I've been looking at a duncan antiquity myself
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:09 pm
by Aeon
[youtube][/youtube]
Jaguars/Jazzmasters have been mainstream for a long time ya'lls...
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:12 pm
by aen
Electric guitars, yo. Truly indie kids play electric cello.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:13 pm
by dots
well, duh. fender wouldn't offer 5 different models of them (avri, cp, cp hh, hh special, baritone) if nobody wanted jags. i was more referring to their popularity with shortscale.org members. . . however, it should be pointed out that the cp models were only introduced in the last couple of years. it does seem to make sense that one would only offer more varieties of a product when there is demand to support it.
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:12 am
by shae
robroe wrote:everyone sold thier broncos to get teles. it made me sad. fuck yall' i still got both
i cant afford a jag and im not getting rid of my bronco or esquier
I had a valid reason. Whilst the Jag neck was poifect, the Bronco neck was ridiculously small for me.
So I had to sell it based on the fact that I could barely fret it.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:31 pm
by hwestman
I do think it makes sense to say that the Jag is the new Tele since the latter used to be known as the unforgiving guitar which wouldn't give you anything for free, the one you had to fight but who would give a lot back once you mastered it...
This is at least part of what attracts me to the jag and what used to attract me to the tele (still am very attracted btw...)
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:16 pm
by dots
hwestman wrote:I do think it makes sense to say that the Jag is the new Tele since the latter used to be known as the unforgiving guitar which wouldn't give you anything for free, the one you had to fight but who would give a lot back once you mastered it...
This is at least part of what attracts me to the jag and what used to attract me to the tele (still am very attracted btw...)
never owned a tele, but i've played many. it's a much simpler instrument, but i think it's just as difficult to master. i think the jag's only difficult to get right in the setup, because after that. . . they just seem to play themselves. it's probably one of the more versatile guitars i've ever had.
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:35 am
by Mages
cool johnny marr video where he talks about his guitars and amps and some of differences he sees between the tele and the jaguar.
[youtube][/youtube]
Re: JAGUAR: the new telecaster
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:55 am
by MattK
Haze wrote:
Chicago Mike wrote:Yes Sir....love'em Fender Telecasters. Alghouth I want to put a humbucker in the neck of mine.
likewise, I've been looking at a duncan antiquity myself
Like this, WHAT I JUST BOUGHT AND HAVE TO WAIT FOR IN TRANSIT!
(83 Squier Tele Custom, SQ series)
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:07 am
by Haze
Squire w/ a WRHB + ashtray bridge? want????Awaewfa d
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:10 am
by MattK
Japan made, although it's only a reissue WRHB (flat ceramic magnet, not like the vintage ones).
I'm fascinated by the bridge tho - it says "FENDER PAT PEND" which doesn't seem like it should be on a Squier.
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 am
by light rail coyote
aen wrote:Electric guitars, yo. Truly indie kids play electric cello.
Like my friend Rushad from TORNADO RIDER!!!
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:25 am
by prospect
I've always been a Jaguar person but I've GAS'ng Teles big time recently
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:43 am
by Mages
MatthewK wrote:'m fascinated by the bridge tho - it says "FENDER PAT PEND" which doesn't seem like it should be on a Squier.
I was thinking about that too but aren't there squiers with fender stamped rolled steel saddles? I think that's just the only kind they make. so if they're gonna use that bridge plate they use the fender one. it would be more expensive to start up a whole new production of non-fender stamped hardware.
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:38 pm
by Markn951
When's the Fender Arrow/Musiclander gonna have its time? It's the COOLEST GUITAR EVAR!!1!