Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:44 pm
by dezb1
Noirie. wrote:Prefer this one
Image
+1 for the black

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:46 pm
by dezb1
Image

+

Image

=

Image

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:53 pm
by Josh
i was guessing a mix between a DC les paul and a telecaster.

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:55 pm
by Noirie.
I'd trade my wilshire without a second thought if i saw the one i posted.

Might go up denmark street tomorrow just in case...

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:09 am
by damienblair17
I like it. Not too sure about the toggly on the lower horn.

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:44 am
by SpaceFace
Yeah I have to say the only things I dont like about their guitars are the headstocks. Also I am not a fan of emg's but I am sure if you just switched out the pickups for something else the guitars whole just be perfect, playability wise and price wise. I have always been nothing but shocked by them. And as far as the look of them being 'too metal' I dont really care just as long as they sound good. I once played a jackson rhoads, probably the most metal looking guitar and yet the thing sounded great for jazz stuff. Go figure.

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:29 am
by jcyphe
They made one that looked more "Fenderish" before this one. Straight 6 tuners, dots, no goofy 12th fret inlay. This exact model was in a pawnshop by me for $175 bucks but I found the neck way too skinny.


Image

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:32 am
by SpaceFace
Also at one time they made a nice strat copy. Dont know if they still make them anymore but those things were nice. And if I remember correctly they made them all distressed and cool looking.

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:34 am
by Mages
yea, they make strat copies
Image

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:21 am
by hotrodperlmutter
damn. that one jcyphe posted actually looks pretty nice. would play it.

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:48 am
by Bacchus
That's nice, apart from the atrocious inlays. No chance would I play it with those inlays, which is silly, but there you go.