crazy. other than the exposed pole piece configuration, i wonder why they bother calling them that. seems kinda silly.paul_ wrote:Yeah I have one and they don't sound like a WRHB, even reissue. I'm also pretty sure they're ceramic magnet.Aeon wrote:Those use typical Gibson-style pickup construction, and don't really sound like a WR at all from reviews I've read. The Novak at least has construction details closer to a true WR.dots wrote:i'd like to hear comparisons of these novaks to these gfs versions. ffs, they're just a little over 1/5 the price, but my guess is they sound 19/20 as good.
ordered some curtis novak wide range pickups today
Moderated By: mods
- dots
- BADmin (he/him)
- Posts: 1022402
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
- Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
- Contact:
marketing.dots wrote:crazy. other than the exposed pole piece configuration, i wonder why they bother calling them that. seems kinda silly.paul_ wrote:Yeah I have one and they don't sound like a WRHB, even reissue. I'm also pretty sure they're ceramic magnet.Aeon wrote: Those use typical Gibson-style pickup construction, and don't really sound like a WR at all from reviews I've read. The Novak at least has construction details closer to a true WR.
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...