Hi, About the boss ds pedals!
Moderated By: mods
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
I used to have a DS-1, loved it for the good cheapness of the pedal, it was nice for a solid 3 months of bedroom play, it started bugging, so I got rid of it. A year later I got a RAT, it was love for awhile, I used it almost for a year. Then I got a Big Muff, and basically said "Fuck you rat!" and threw it off my board, the Rat was way to rough and flat, kind of dull to my ears when I got my Muff. I recommend the Big Muff.
You basically have to rely on the amp to make it sound good- through a nice warm amp, they're just about usable- through a beginners solidstate amp, badly dialled in, they sound like SHITE.
RATs however generally sound more pleasant through whatever you stick 'em through.. probably because there's some/more of the clean signal coming through.
RATs however generally sound more pleasant through whatever you stick 'em through.. probably because there's some/more of the clean signal coming through.
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
I havent tried the vk dirty channel...JSutter wrote:Have you tried using the VK's dirty channel? That should sound good enough, at least far better than a DS1. There are a few quick tricks with that amp to changes its tone. Check the peavey bar and grille for the info.
Hey is the DS2 any louder than the DS1? Is there any tonal difference between them when not in turbo mode?
Every effect i have comes from a pedal.. Like Opeth, they are turning every buttons on, 0 and then take out the effects from their pedals.. And Opeth have a good distortion sound on their records!
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
like the Mudhoney sound in touch me, im sick?Ty wrote:I used to have a DS-1, loved it for the good cheapness of the pedal, it was nice for a solid 3 months of bedroom play, it started bugging, so I got rid of it. A year later I got a RAT, it was love for awhile, I used it almost for a year. Then I got a Big Muff, and basically said "Fuck you rat!" and threw it off my board, the Rat was way to rough and flat, kind of dull to my ears when I got my Muff. I recommend the Big Muff.
- IroniaSudby
- .
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:24 pm
- Location: New York City
I think the main sound sound in that song is the Superfuzz, tho i think Steve usesweeping_moon wrote:like the Mudhoney sound in touch me, im sick?Ty wrote:I used to have a DS-1, loved it for the good cheapness of the pedal, it was nice for a solid 3 months of bedroom play, it started bugging, so I got rid of it. A year later I got a RAT, it was love for awhile, I used it almost for a year. Then I got a Big Muff, and basically said "Fuck you rat!" and threw it off my board, the Rat was way to rough and flat, kind of dull to my ears when I got my Muff. I recommend the Big Muff.
a big muff so you'll get some Mudhoney tonez.
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
okay now i remember, thats why the album is called superfuzz bigmuff!IroniaSudby wrote:I think the main sound sound in that song is the Superfuzz, tho i think Steve usesweeping_moon wrote:like the Mudhoney sound in touch me, im sick?Ty wrote:I used to have a DS-1, loved it for the good cheapness of the pedal, it was nice for a solid 3 months of bedroom play, it started bugging, so I got rid of it. A year later I got a RAT, it was love for awhile, I used it almost for a year. Then I got a Big Muff, and basically said "Fuck you rat!" and threw it off my board, the Rat was way to rough and flat, kind of dull to my ears when I got my Muff. I recommend the Big Muff.
a big muff so you'll get some Mudhoney tonez.
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
I think you would really like the Sansamp GT2... or the Behringer equivalent...
you can achieve a really fat saturated high gain tones out of that without even needing buckers... the californian setting is great for that Joe Sat kinda fing.
Prob a bit shreddy for you but you can get an idea....
[youtube][/youtube]
Also offers some nice low gain functions too...
O
you can achieve a really fat saturated high gain tones out of that without even needing buckers... the californian setting is great for that Joe Sat kinda fing.
Prob a bit shreddy for you but you can get an idea....
[youtube][/youtube]
Also offers some nice low gain functions too...
O
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
okay, then i see...Mike wrote:It's a pedal, not an amp. It can sound like many different flavours of distortion or overdriveweeping_moon wrote:im not a big fan of marshall amps!Mike wrote:I always recommend the Marshall GV-2 Guv'nor Plus.
It's pretty much the same price and sounds unbelievable.
the marshall effect pedals sounds pretty good i think.. i once tryed a chorus pedal of marshall, that one was awesome!