Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 5:59 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
that looks really nice. run that cord through the bottom!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:37 pm
by jumbledupthinking
Yeah, that's definitely the plan.

Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:41 pm
by Lucamo
Digging up an old thread cause relevant.

SO I WANT A PARLOUR guitar too... and I was wondering if y'all think I be dumb to consider buying either of these:

Harmony Stella

or

Harmony Stella 2

Are these the sorta things you gotta try to buy? I've played parlours but I don't wanna spend 400 on a new one, if I can get a classy old one for like 150 shipped. I am just worried that old cheap acoustics = warped bullshit forever.

Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:33 pm
by Gabriel
The stella 2 looks really nice, but I really don't know a lot about them.

Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:11 pm
by dezb1
Gabriel wrote:The stella looks really nice, but I really don't know a lot about them.
Adjusted to agree with me... the edge binding on the Stella 2 looks balls

Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:42 pm
by Gabriel
So much binding, so much win!

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:28 am
by dezb1
Gabriel wrote:So much binding, so much win!
Each to their own...

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:07 am
by serfx
out of the two, i'd say go for the stella

the stella two just looks too busy to my eyes..

but without playing them its hard to know..

I own a 1952 harmony acoustic that was my dads (i'm the second owner) and a 72 harmony Les Paul copy that came stock with DiMarzios (that would eventually become the super distortion pickups..)

both of them are hands down better then any other harmony I've ever played.. i've owned a few others as well, but always ended up trading them along, as they've either needed to much work or just sounded like shite..

including another 72 les paul copy, but it must have been a cheaper model, as it was chambered, and didn't come with DiMarzios..


I find the thing about Harmony guitars is that the fancier they look, the more the crazy options they did to them, the worse they play..

so maybe thats why I did the first link.

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:27 pm
by ekwatts
Gretsch make a parlour for £150 or something.

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:27 pm
by DanHeron
The Gretsch parlor is kind of modeled on those old ones as well:
Image

I would be wary of those ones on ebay. They might be ok but I would bet the action and playability sucks.

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:06 pm
by sunshiner
I also like parlor acoustics. There is something charming in their size and appearance How about this one?
Fender CP-100 Parlor, costs €162 in Thomann, though it's not available at the moment.
Image

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:27 pm
by serfx
sunshiner wrote:I also like parlor acoustics. There is something charming in their size and appearance How about this one?
Fender CP-100 Parlor, costs €162 in Thomann, though it's not available at the moment.
Image
I literally almost bought one of these last week instead of the tim armstrong hellcat..


beautiful little guitars..
and if I had been looking for a parlor guitar instead of something a bit bigger, thats what I would have bought..
(I don't even know what make or anything about the current parlor i have.. I picked it up in Goleta at a pawn shop for $50 in january of 2006..)

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:39 pm
by cur
Subway always has a bunch of refurbished old ones on their website.

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:10 am
by Lucamo
cur wrote:Subway always has a bunch of refurbished old ones on their website.
This website confuses the hell out of me.


ASIDE:

I am currently bidding on this thing, I hope it goes well. Seller even included recording and pictures that make the action appear to be fine. Stella Harmony

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:25 pm
by Lucamo
Lucamo wrote:
I am currently bidding on this thing, I hope it goes well. Seller even included recording and pictures that make the action appear to be fine.

Stella Harmony
Well I bought it, all birch not sure of the year, and with shipping it cost me what the new Gretsch would probably cost me and I'm willing to bank this will play better even with all the age.

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 11:44 pm
by Chris Fleming
I'm not sure I'd ever buy an acoustic with a scratch plate that's screwed on... seems to me like a bad sign. Any that I've seen up close like that have painted on binding and are poorly made.

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:36 am
by George
not quite a traditional parlour (14th fret join, slightly larger body maybe) but i bought a Vintage V300 for £130 recently. it is a phenomenal amount of guitar for the money. maybe they do them in canada?

the ones you're looking at look cute but i don't think they'll be particularly loud or toneful.

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:42 am
by dezb1
George wrote:not quite a traditional parlour (14th fret join, slightly larger body maybe) but i bought a Vintage V300 for £130 recently. it is a phenomenal amount of guitar for the money. maybe they do them in canada?

the ones you're looking at look cute but i don't think they'll be particularly loud or toneful.

Excellent guitar, I've recommend them to a few people wanting a good starter acoustic... so if (or should I say when) they get bored trying to learn I'll get one for free... or at least cheap

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:06 am
by Gabriel
The mahogany V300 has been on my radar for quite some time, would make a nice cheap acoustic to just have kicking around.

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:20 am
by George
i had mine setup with the action lowered and some elixir phosphors and it's a dream. very punchy, great for finger style.

i'm not an acoustic aficionado but that's me sorted for a while.