ShortScale.org

endsjustifymeans wrote:just looks like a pickguardless charvel surfcaster with buckers. In another finish I'd hit it.

I want a 12 string Surfcaster. Too bad they're ridiculously expensive.

edit: Like this one. This finish. This.

woof. that paint always reminds me of shitty Florida hotel art. or aquariums. that guitar looks awful.

You need finger extensions to reach those upper frets.

I think my B&B Jazzmaster with humbuckers makes a better Jazzmaster / Les Paul cross.

Did not like the look of that. Fender shapes looks wierd in fancy paintjobs and bindings.

My dad's got a fenix tele/"les paul" hybrid that's pretty sick. Looks like this:

(not my pic, not his guitar)
Plays fairly good but the tuners and bridge pretty much suck.

In my opinion, any shape looks good with binding, just not all guitars suit both back and front binding. Slap some front-body binding on any Fender shape, be it a strat or a Jaguar, and it looks instantly super classy, and remains comfortable because of the back contouring. Teles work well either way.

I'd rock their SG copy in the mint green with the bigsby.

Infact im fucking buying one with my christmas bonus.

I like it. Yeah, would like ergonomic contours. But nice modestly offset shape. In a Fender Neck Amber finish, matching headstock with a maple neck...mmmm, nice.