Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:00 pm
by Fran
Good call.

Pricey but damn good.

Re: Replacement Pickups

Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:03 pm
by SGJarrod
Ian wrote:I hate my Gibson Les Paul Std.

It sounds like poo.

I really like my Strat Plus, it came with Lace Sensor Gold pickups which are really low output.

My other favorite is my Tele with a Lil 59'

I don't want to just stick a duncan 59 in my paul. I want something more unique. A little cooler sounding. But nothing with more output than a 59.

What do you think?
If the stock ones are BurstBucker pros I maybe interested in buying them off ya.....????? :shock:

Re: Replacement Pickups

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:53 pm
by weeping_moon
mrperson wrote:
weeping_moon wrote:
Ian wrote:But nothing with more output than a 59.
Put a Dimarzio Steves Special humbucker.
The Steves Special is 18K, which is very high output.
yes i know. but listen to the sound samples from john petrucci solo album suspended animation. a hot, full, thick (fat) sound.
a lovley humbucker.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:27 pm
by Doog
Again, more down to the amp, pedals and technique he's using.

I guarantee you, he could've played a stock Jagmaster on that track and it wouldn't sounded much different, especially when there's a ton of gain involved. Unless you're playing clean guitar into a clean amp, you can't put too much emphasis on the pickup.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:46 pm
by George
18k is literally too high unless you're a virtuoso. That's not even an opinion. I'm being objective and speaking about everyone. Have you actually played one? Any shmuck like me or you wouldn't have the dexterity and ability not to make every whistly noise and squeek make you sound like shit.

I tried a Dimebucker and that happened and that's only 16.5k. Dimebag could use it because he was a master of that sort of thing (which I have no interest in. Whatsoever. Ever.)

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:48 pm
by Gabriel
GeorgeF wrote:18k is literally too high unless you're a virtuoso. That's not even an opinion. I'm not Have you actually played one? Any shmuck like me or you wouldn't have the dexterity and ability not to make every whistly noise and squeek make you sound like shit.

I tried a Dimebucker and that happened and that's only 16.5k. Dimebag could use it because he was a master of that sort of thing (which I have no interest in. Whatsoever. Ever.)
I used to have a guitar with a motherbucker in, it was 21K or something rediculous 8)

but I grew out of it 8k is as high output as I want to go these days.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:52 pm
by George
That's pretty good going, chief. With the Dimebucker it was stupid. Trying to tap, palm mute and generally shred about was a complete nightmare and made me and my friend sound terrible. Plus no cleans, innit.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:05 pm
by Gabriel
Yh it was a challenge, definitely helped my accuracy, but tone-wise it wasn't a nice thing. I'd much rather have a low-medium output humbucker with a nice warm sound.

I play mostly clean these days, playing Jazz and all.

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:55 pm
by weeping_moon
mrperson wrote:
GeorgeF wrote:18k is literally too high unless you're a virtuoso. That's not even an opinion. I'm not Have you actually played one? Any shmuck like me or you wouldn't have the dexterity and ability not to make every whistly noise and squeek make you sound like shit.

I tried a Dimebucker and that happened and that's only 16.5k. Dimebag could use it because he was a master of that sort of thing (which I have no interest in. Whatsoever. Ever.)
I used to have a guitar with a motherbucker in, it was 21K or something rediculous 8)

but I grew out of it 8k is as high output as I want to go these days.
well it depends on what youre playing. for jazz its no use i guess.
try play a dirty progressive solo with good sustain and youll see what im talking about.

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:27 pm
by Doog
Image