Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 1:54 pm
Bound necks look good on any guitar!
<3Dave wrote:nogoodhonk wrote:bound necks on fenders look cheap, imo.
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 2:28 pm
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 2:35 pm
I LIKE HOW ALL THE SADDLES ARE EXACTLY IN LINE.
ALMOST LIKE NO CARE WAS TAKEN IN MAKING THE GUITAR!!!!!!!!
TOTALLY WORTH ITTTTTTTT
ALMOST LIKE NO CARE WAS TAKEN IN MAKING THE GUITAR!!!!!!!!
TOTALLY WORTH ITTTTTTTT
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 6:53 pm
Wow - is it ever!plesiosaurus wrote:ugly headstock is ugly
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:21 pm
plus eleven-teenDave wrote:nogoodhonk wrote:bound necks on fenders look cheap, imo.
► Show Spoiler
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:22 pm
Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:34 am
Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:34 am
O NO U DIDN'T
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:45 am
Lupulus wrote:
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:59 am
Dude, thems fighting words around here.Lupulus wrote:Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:20 am
Lupulus wrote:Ive had a lupus and it sucked. The herpes gave you unusable rashes. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the condoms were to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Something stupid. The enlarged headstocks was again retarded. The things felt unnatural in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another mistake totally. The lupus have never been popular for a reason.
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:23 am
Lupulus wrote:
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:50 am
Lupulus: favorite poster of 2011!
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:16 am
actually in it's day the mustang was one of the most popular guitars fender made. they were one of their most consistent sellers, that's why they kept making them for so many years. you might not like the sounds of a mustang but that's certainly a subjective thing don't you think? most people here would prefer their sound to a humdrum humbucker. don't really know what a "stupid alien lipstick lever" is. I personally quite like the big 70s fender headstocks, to each his own I suppose. I also like .10 strings just fine. any lower than that and I think the tone suffers.Lupulus wrote:Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
I don't care much for the attention to detail on this fano (or lack there of). the edge routing looks too squared off, the control plate is too thin. the solutions to the mustang "problems" are all rather obvious and boring choices.
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:18 am
Lupulus wrote:
Re: Fender mustang sucks
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:44 am
Lupulus wrote:Ive had a fender mustang and it sucked. The switches gave you unusable tones. It neede 10,s or higher becuase the 24" shortscale was to rubber bandy. The vintage frets and 7.25 fretted out always. Bridge was this stupid alien lipstick lever taht looked stupid beyond belief. The enlarged headstock was again retarded. The thing felt unsubstantial in your hands and the tone and pickups were pathetically thin.
The fanos specs solves most of these problems especially the compound radius. From the videos ofthe pawnshop, another fender mistake tonally. The mustangs have never been popular for a reason.
BUddy, you sure came to the right place! Welcome home!
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:31 am
wow, this is becoming a gay thread, no offense for gay people.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:06 am
ITT: Fanos guy googles himself.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:07 am
douche bagAaronGuitarDude wrote:wow, this is becoming a gay thread, no offense for gay people.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:26 am
I like gay.
Lupulus is either Fano dude or sock puppet or returned disgruntled ban-ee. Poor hillbilly? Quite funny though.
Lupulus is either Fano dude or sock puppet or returned disgruntled ban-ee. Poor hillbilly? Quite funny though.