Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:19 pm
by Fran
gaybear wrote:how do folks keep strings on for 2 years!?!
Like me, when guitars sit in cases and get used maybe on a dozen occasions a year :lol:

Re: So I finally changed the strings on my Jaguar....

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:32 pm
by taylornutt
Ankhanu wrote:
johnnyseven wrote:
taylornutt wrote:I got the guitar almost 2 years ago and never changed them out.
I would suggest that this was a major factor for the huge variation in sound as well as the type of strings.
To a degree, but likely a minor one. I'm speaking from bass experience, rather than guitar (I've never used flats on guitar), but Once flats lose their initial "brightness" (Which happens within about a week of playing), they maintain a fairly consistent tone for years on end. Again, at least with bass, the difference between flats and rounds is pretty astounding.
gaybear wrote:how do folks keep strings on for 2 years!?!

i thought i was bad about changing strings..haha
Ridiculous with rounds... not unusual with flats (again, bass :P )
I think it applies to guitar as well. That pretty much describes what I experienced. The flatwounds sounded consistent, so I never felt I need to change them. Rounds always sounded dull or dead so it was obvious they need to be changed.

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:52 pm
by benecol
taylornutt wrote:I have built 2 guitars in the last year (Baja Tele and Fender Musicmaster) so it has not been used as much.
I think you may have mentioned this before.

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:49 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
yes, but on how many occasions have you mentioned that he's mentioned it before? surely tit for tat, no?

almost as annoying, like.

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:50 am
by othomas2
And how many times have you mentioned that he's mentioned, that he's mentioned that.

Surely tit for tat tit.

I think if there was a wealth of traffic here then it may be annoying....

Personally I don't like d'daddario's though... too buzzy and shrill.

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:47 am
by Mages
and how many times have you mentioned that he's mentioned that he's mentioned that he's mentioned that he's mentioned that he's mentioned.....



but yeah strings have a big effect on the guitar sound. it's the first step in the signal chain. the original source of everything you're listening to.

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:43 am
by benecol
I'm just not entirely convinced he's not a spambot for the Sanctimonious Router Company of Wisconsin, est.1934.

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:49 am
by Dave
This thread needs moar tats

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:18 pm
by honeyiscool
othomas2 wrote:Personally I don't like d'daddario's though... too buzzy and shrill.
I like Dads for some things. On short scales I do tend to love them. For everything else I'm slowly switching to GHS. GHS just seems to make more balanced and flexible strings.

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:30 pm
by stewart
Dave wrote:This thread needs less string chat, i really don't care what kind you use or why
fxt

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:52 pm
by gaybear
should probably have been in the effects, amps, gear section, but i like talking about string types

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:45 pm
by Tweedhead
Me too. I have been using D'Addario flats on my guitars and their tone is consistent.
Mostly, I change the strings when my luthier and I need to take them off for a repair or modification.
Never felt any reason to switch them out, they tune nicely and sound good.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:54 am
by Dave
I use Spaghetti - I prefer Napolina brand as it seems to retain a certain firmness and 'snap' to the tone for longer than Asda's own brand. Mojo tip: A light oiling in full fat butter really brings out the mids!!

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 2:54 pm
by Bacchus
Anyone complaining about people talking about gear in a gear forum should probably fuck off back into the pub and start bickering matches in there instead.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:06 pm
by Dave
I have no probs with string chat here old bean but I miss narry a chance for a wee jest!

Anyways I'm going to drop a bomb here. SORRY SHORTSCALE I'M GOING DOWN TO 11s to 10s ON MY JAG. Thicker strings sound 'thunky' on shortscales and I personally dislike the feel. THERE I SAID IT. I'll use tens on fullscale still oddly...

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:18 pm
by cur
Dave wrote: Anyways I'm going to drop a bomb here. SORRY SHORTSCALE I'M GOING DOWN TO 11s to 10s ON MY JAG. Thicker strings sound 'thunky' on shortscales and I personally dislike the feel. THERE I SAID IT. I'll use tens on fullscale still oddly...
What?

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:42 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
BacchusPaul wrote:Anyone complaining about people talking about gear in a gear forum should probably fuck off back into the pub and start bickering matches in there instead.
welcome back, paul!

i was just thinking about you last night, wondering where you had been and if you were still jamming on your harmonica!

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 5:42 pm
by honeyiscool
Dave wrote:Anyways I'm going to drop a bomb here. SORRY SHORTSCALE I'M GOING DOWN TO 11s to 10s ON MY JAG. Thicker strings sound 'thunky' on shortscales and I personally dislike the feel. THERE I SAID IT. I'll use tens on fullscale still oddly...
I always use 10s on short scales. I use 9.5s or 9s on standard scale, too. :>

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:21 pm
by chemistforhire
Dave wrote:I have no probs with string chat here old bean but I miss narry a chance for a wee jest!

Anyways I'm going to drop a bomb here. SORRY SHORTSCALE I'M GOING DOWN TO 11s to 10s ON MY JAG. Thicker strings sound 'thunky' on shortscales and I personally dislike the feel. THERE I SAID IT. I'll use tens on fullscale still oddly...

I use 10's on everything. I also noticed that thunky sound when I used thicker gauges.