Gibson Midtown

AaronGuitarDude · Post by **AaronGuitarDude** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:49 am

urgh! ugly headstock, queer knob. no offense for queer peeps.

hotrodperlmutter · Post by **hotrodperlmutter** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:35 am

if it just had a resonator tail-piece on it, rather than that gaudy ass bigsby, and knob / toggly / knob, i'd probably be down like a clown, charlie brrrrrroww-.

down like a clown charlie brrrr brrrroooowwww-.

down like a clown charlie broooooowwww-.

down like a clown charlie brown.

Simon · Post by **Simon** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:09 am

stewart wrote:
Simon wrote:
paul_ wrote:I'd rather a 339. Apart from the Bigsby this thing looks pretty boring.
This. I think it's pretty much a 339 apart from they've completely messed with the headstock shape. Seems like an utterly pointless design when they have something that's so similar already being made.
i think this one is essentially a solid body guitar with a wee bit of chambering, according to the specs.

I see. I was too lazy to look at them, in honesty! I still think it looks pretty offensive... Looks like a knock-off rather than the real deal.

71Smallbox · Post by **71Smallbox** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:50 pm

The headstock totally reminds me of Heritage guitars, which are clones of Gibsons, so headstock is a copy of a copy essientially.

George · Post by **George** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:53 pm

AaronGuitarDude wrote:urgh! ugly headstock, queer knob. no offense for queer peeps.

Is it alright for other people to say queer knob, or is that like "your word"?