Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:49 am
by AaronGuitarDude
urgh! ugly headstock, queer knob. no offense for queer peeps.
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:35 am
by hotrodperlmutter
if it just had a resonator tail-piece on it, rather than that gaudy ass bigsby, and knob / toggly / knob, i'd probably be down like a clown, charlie brrrrrroww-.
down like a clown charlie brrrr brrrroooowwww-.
down like a clown charlie broooooowwww-.
down like a clown charlie brown.
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:09 am
by Simon
stewart wrote:Simon wrote:paul_ wrote:I'd rather a 339. Apart from the Bigsby this thing looks pretty boring.
This. I think it's pretty much a 339 apart from they've completely messed with the headstock shape. Seems like an utterly pointless design when they have something that's so similar already being made.
i think this one is essentially a solid body guitar with a wee bit of chambering, according to the specs.
I see. I was too lazy to look at them, in honesty! I still think it looks pretty offensive... Looks like a knock-off rather than the real deal.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:50 pm
by 71Smallbox
The headstock totally reminds me of Heritage guitars, which are clones of Gibsons, so headstock is a copy of a copy essientially.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:53 pm
by George
AaronGuitarDude wrote:urgh! ugly headstock, queer knob. no offense for queer peeps.
Is it alright for other people to say queer knob, or is that like "your word"?