robroe wrote:
i still dont understand why they dont release the french show on some sort of dvd or cd + dvd combo thing.
its the best combo of looks/sound that they ever did
It really is one of the best Nirvana shows.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:15 pm
by paul_
stewart wrote:urgh, i wonder how unobtainable those VIs are. SEVENTY MILLION YEN (+shipping).
hahaha
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:56 pm
by jcyphe
Throw it on the ground trouble starts at 1:57, lolz
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:11 pm
by robroe
i wonder if the fiesta RI has the same inability to play more than 1:57 minutes before breaking
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:43 pm
by Dave
Dunno, they look wrong as a four piece to me. Sorry Pat. So few of the songs benefit at all from a second guitar.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:48 pm
by cobascis
Dave wrote:Dunno, they look wrong as a four piece to me. Sorry Pat. So few of the songs benefit at all from a second guitar.
Really? Just the sound from the live shows in the In Utero era is so much better to me.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:57 pm
by jcyphe
So much better. Kurt was freer to sing better and they sounded more dynamic.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:01 pm
by George
Not seen that vid where he's on only on mic. Nice little treat, I think it worked great.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:22 pm
by cobascis
What is Pat's guitar? Hagstrom something?
EDIT: Hey, I lost 300 or so posts. Lame
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:29 pm
by A_saVANT
They need a double bound semi-hollow Bass VI, with blocks and binding and matching headstock and TORTTTT.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:29 pm
by Dave
I'm a power trio elitist chaps, I can't help it. It's not even so much how it sounds - quite irrational I admit
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:36 pm
by cobascis
Dave wrote:I'm a power trio elitist chaps, I can't help it. It's not even so much how it sounds - quite irrational I admit
I agree it doesn't look quite as awesome especially when they are on a huge arena type stage, but in general I'm pro-Pat.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:49 pm
by James
Pro Pat (Pacafeliz)
Indifferent to Pat (Smear)
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:32 pm
by iglue
BacchusPaul wrote:A lot of these guitars are ones that I wouldn't want to play but am very happy that someone is making them.
So much jizzzzzzzzzz
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:47 pm
by A_saVANT
iglue wrote:
BacchusPaul wrote:A lot of these guitars are ones that I wouldn't want to play but am very happy that someone is making them.
So much jizzzzzzzzzz
Jizzmaster.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:55 pm
by Joey
Whoa, never seen the Kurtz rock a mic before
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:30 pm
by paul_
His Jaguar was so much better sounding than those JapanStangs it isn't even funny.
Compare them clean intros. That Stang sounds like it's doing an BM rather than an JB.
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:59 pm
by Addam
paul_ wrote:His Jaguar was so much better sounding than those JapanStangs it isn't even funny.
Compare them clean intros. That Stang sounds like it's doing an BM rather than an JB.
I disagree, they both sound good, but different. It's a pot thing; I'm guessing the Jag is running with 1M pots and the Mustang 250k.
In the context of having 2 guitarists it works because their guitars sound different. I think it contributes to them having a bigger sound on the In Utero tour.
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:18 am
by ultratwin
I see great value in the reissuing of a CIJ BASS SEX VI, and is probably the only guitar out there right now that I could actually justify adding to the collection...Maybe.
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 6:38 am
by Fran
James wrote:That's the first time I've seen a bound body Mustang with an F hole. It looks more like a lapel badge than a real guitar
I must admit i prefer Fenders to stay more traditional looking on finishes. A Fender Cyclone Custom sold locally for a bargain £255 yesterday, but i just could'nt see past the quilted top on it. Mind you, the new CIC stuff looks like they have 50 coats of poly.
