Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:37 pm
by ekalks
Thanks. I lowered the action now to 2/64th.
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:37 pm
by theshadowofseattle
ekalks wrote:Thanks. I lowered the action now to 2/64th.
If you were one of my physics students, you'd have just failed your assignment.
1. Reduce that fraction. 1/32nd
2. Fractions are for fourth graders. Solve for 0.03.
3. You didn't write your units.
4. If you meant inches, convert to cm for 0.08 cm.
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:38 pm
by theshadowofseattle
BUT YOUR DUO SONIC IS ON POINT THO
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:57 pm
by ekalks
You apparently knew what I was talking about. The nomenclature /64th is used as reference and a common measurement while performing fretwork to analyze string action. Obviously you can reduce the fraction to it's lowest common denominator. Now ask yourself this question and think about it before answering. Why would anyone use /64 instead of /32? If you were one of my students in any of my college engineering classes I would have scolded you for interrupting my class with such nonsense. BTW I can also be facetious. Thanks for the on point remark though.
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:00 pm
by luciguci
TEACHER FIGHT
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:35 pm
by ekalks
LOL!
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:44 pm
by theshadowofseattle
ekalks wrote:You apparently knew what I was talking about. The nomenclature /64th is used as reference and a common measurement while performing fretwork to analyze string action. Obviously you can reduce the fraction to it's lowest common denominator. Now ask yourself this question and think about it before answering. Why would anyone use /64 instead of /32? If you were one of my students in any of my college engineering classes I would have scolded you for interrupting my class with such nonsense. BTW I can also be facetious. Thanks for the on point remark though.
This one's alright, guys.