It's alright, it moves in mysterious ways, just like uno, dos tres, catorce!plopswagon wrote:So strange this would happen in October, I’m really at War with myself over it. Boy, it’s such a catchy riff Unforgettable in its Fire.NickD wrote:Have you found out, or you Still Haven’t Found What I’m (you’re) Looking For. I could do some work to help, pro Bono.plopswagon wrote:I was wondering if U2 were trying to figure it out. It’s on the Edge of my tongue. I hope we don’t suffer not being able to figure it out before Sunday (bloody, Sunday)
EHX Nano DMM
Moderated By: mods
- 71Smallbox
- .
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
- Location: Springsteen
- 71Smallbox
- .
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
- Location: Springsteen
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
In the big-ass chassis version the blend goes to 100% and delay time low enough for a standalone vibrato, sounds rather nice actually.Doog wrote:FR, that's one reason I've steered clear of DMM-style circuits; I want wobble control, damnitFakir Mustache wrote:Too bad it doesn't have a knob for the modulation rate.
I'd be curious to know if the blend goes full wet and delay goes low enough to kinda make this a standalone vibrato...
http://www.ehx.com/products/nano-deluxe ... -man/#more
So close; 30ms is definitely enough for it to feel like latency
I like to imagine it's Mike Matthews himself.Doog wrote:Hahaha, Boomer On Duty on EHX's socials!
"DIGITAL?! What're you GAY??"
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"